The Chinese COMMUNIST party (CCP) and goverment usually go to great lengths to cover up events or trends they think will challenge their rule. However, every now and then they surprise the world with their candor.
Take corruption: The party disclosed last week that 660,000 officials had been punished for corruption over the past five years. He Guoqiang (賀國強), head of the party’s Central Commission for Disciplinary Inspection, said: “Investigating corruption cases is a long-term task in the process of building a clean government.”
The most prominent of the recent cases of corruption has been that of Bo Xilai (薄熙來), the former provincial chief of the party in Chongqing, in southwestern China, who was dismissed for alleged abuse of power. However, the disciplinary commission chief pointed out that a railways minister and the mayor of Shenzen had also been fired.
His disclosure did not specify the forms of corruption involved, but anecdotal evidence suggests that bribery and embezzlement are commonplace. Local party officials have long been accused of underhanded seizures of land and property for personal gain.
To put things in perspective, the 660,000 punished bureaucrats comprise merely 3 percent of the 20 million Chinese government and party, national, provincial and local employees (as estimated by the UN). However, looking at it another way, the number of punished officials also equals about half of the entire population of the state of Hawaii.
He, who is a member of the politburo (China’s senior executive board), said earlier that a five-year anti-corruption campaign would be launched by the party congress scheduled to meet in Beijing next month.
“A sound system for punishing and curbing corruption is an important guarantee for the nation’s development,” He said.
In another anti-corruption plea, He recently visited major publications to encourage editorial staff to make greater contributions to public education against corruption. He told them that “anti-graft” education was fundamental to the CCP’s endeavors to build a clean government.
The Chinese corruption that perhaps most concerns US and other foreign investors is the theft of intellectual property such as patented processes. Especially worrisome is the failure of the Chinese government to enforce regulations intended to safeguard intellectual property.
The Economist Intelligence Unit said in a report: “Uncertainty over China’s protection of intellectual property and shifting Chinese priorities and policies can undermine deals with Chinese enterprises.”
Still another form of corruption, according to the Data Centre of China Internet, is Internet users in China getting slower download speeds than they paid for. Of China’s 1.3 billion people, 538 million have access to the Internet via smartphone or computer.
“Increasing numbers of Internet users in China shelling out for faster broadband are complaining that they’re not getting what they paid for,” reported Xinhua, the official news agency.
Along the same lines as the anti-corruption moves, the Chinese government last week issued a white paper on judicial reform. Among its provisions was a prohibition against obtaining confessions through torture; another intended to protect attorneys in defending suspects; and a third calling for prudent application of the death penalty.
A senior official, Jiang Wei (姜維), told the Chinese press: “The problems can only be solved by the Chinese way and wisdom. Copying foreign experience or systems might lead to a bad end.” This came in response to a question regarding whether China’s judicial system should follow Western models.
He said that China was keen to learn from the experience of other countries and would incorporate judicial concepts and practices utilized elsewhere. However, he concluded that the white paper urged a continuous effort to establish a “just, effective and authoritative socialist judicial system with Chinese characteristics.”
Richard Halloran is a commentator in Hawaii.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS