Africa is undergoing a period of unprecedented economic growth. According to The Economist, six of the 10 fastest-growing countries last year were in Africa. Average external debt on the continent has fallen from 63 percent of GDP in 2000 to 22.2 percent this year, while average inflation now stands at 8 percent, down from 15 percent in 2000.
This positive trend is likely to persist, given that it is based on structural geographic and demographic factors, such as rising exports, improved trade conditions and steadily increasing domestic consumption.
However, Africa’s national governments still face significant challenges, given the wide variety of factors at play in each country. Economic characteristics vary significantly by country, depending on, for example, whether a fixed or floating foreign exchange regime is in place and which natural resources the country controls.
As a result, prospects also differ by country. Although the average annual GDP growth rate for the entire continent has been forecast at roughly 6 percent for this year, South Africa’s economy is expected to grow by only 3.6 percent, while Ivory Coast is expected to grow at a rate of 8.5 percent. In order to tailor national economic policy effectively, policymakers must identify the drivers of, and barriers to, growth in each country.
Africa’s growth potential has caught the attention of foreign investors, who have contributed to a rapid increase in capital expenditure. Between 2008 and last year, sub-Saharan Africa received on average 4.4 percent of all funds invested in developing countries worldwide and 3.1 percent of investment spending. Foreign direct investment in Africa has been on the rise since the early 2000s, increasing fivefold from 2000 to 2010. However, foreign investors remain aware of the challenges faced by certain countries. For example, much of the Horn of Africa (particularly Somalia), Mali and Guinea Bissau carry significant political risk.
Nevertheless, many economic indicators suggest that the bullish trend is sustainable and that the conditions needed to change Africa’s image and international trade position are finally in place. Last year, 67 percent of potential investors interviewed said that they considered Africa attractive, while half of them planned to invest in sub-Saharan Africa before next year. In addition, a growing number of large corporations count Africa among their primary strategic targets for business development.
The growth of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) will be a key factor in coping with the risks associated with rapid economic expansion. SMEs already play a crucial role in African economies, involved as they are in all sectors of rural and urban economies.
SMEs are open to innovation, technology transfer and industrialization. They are ideally positioned to make an impact locally, given their willingness to adopt positive environmental and governance practices, and their ability to improve living conditions by creating permanent jobs.
African SMEs also point the way to dynamic, sustainable and fair growth. They have demonstrated a genuine capacity to withstand the effects of crisis, owing to their flexible capital base and limited involvement in the international financial system.
Yet, despite their potential, African SMEs are subject to significant internal and external pressures, including poor infrastructure, high labor costs, deficient governance and a dearth of skilled workers. Above all, they lack access to long-term finance.
Large enterprises can secure financing from banks and other institutional lenders, while microfinance institutions can help finance small enterprises. However, the needs of growing medium-sized enterprises cannot be met by microfinance institutions. As a result, medium-sized enterprises are the missing link — known as “the missing middle” — in many African countries’ economies.
Furthermore, Africa’s SMEs are often unable to secure long-term financing. High information and transaction costs contribute to the perception that investing in SMEs is complicated and expensive.
These smaller enterprises, often young and under-capitalized, appear riskier because they are usually found in poorly regulated markets characterized by an uncertain political or economic environment. This supports the view that investments in SMEs take as much, if not more, time to return a profit than less risky investments with a wider scope.
However, in recent years, many African governments have worked to reduce administrative and legal obstacles for SMEs. From 2000 to 2010, the average time needed to register property rights was reduced from 120 days to 65. The time needed to obtain an export license fell from an average of 230 days in 2005 to 212 days in 2010, while, over the same period, the time needed to enforce a contract was reduced by nearly a month.
African governments know that SMEs help to create new production channels for domestic markets, thereby generating significant added value. A larger domestic market encourages diversification of the national economy, reducing dependence on exports of natural resources and, in turn, exposure to global price fluctuations. This makes economies significantly less vulnerable to external shocks.
African countries’ drive toward domestic development has been accompanied by accelerating regional integration. Rather than allowing Europe and North America to continue to dominate their economic development, sub-Saharan African countries are increasingly pursuing partnerships with their neighbors.
As a result, roughly 15 percent of sub-Saharan African trade is intra-regional, up from only 7 percent in 1990. In 2010, South Africa alone accounted for 4 percent of sub-Saharan imports and 6 percent of exports. Remarkably, this reflects the emergence of new trade flows, not simply the redirection of existing ones.
Africa’s shift toward regional integration encourages competitiveness by distributing more effectively production factors — such as inputs and equipment — and by allowing greater labor mobility. However, it still has a long way to go.
African governments should pursue intra-regional trade liberalization, institutional integration and infrastructure development with greater determination than ever. Their commercial enterprises need to progress in these areas in order to develop further and improve living standards for all.
Jean-Michel Severino, former director of the Agence Francaise du Developpement, is chief executive of I&P Conseil. Emilie Debled is the communications director of I&P Conseil.
Copyright: Project Syndicate/Europe’s World
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
The wrap-up press event on Feb. 1 for the new local period suspense film Murder of the Century (世紀血案), adapted from the true story of the Lin family murders (林家血案) in 1980, has sparked waves of condemnation in the past week, as well as a boycott. The film is based on the shocking, unsolved murders that occurred at then-imprisoned provincial councilor and democracy advocate Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) residence on Feb. 28, 1980, while Lin was detained for his participation in the Formosa Incident, in which police and protesters clashed during a pro-democracy rally in Kaohsiung organized by Formosa Magazine on Dec.
Watching news footage of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials shaking hands and exchanging pleasantries with their counterparts across the Taiwan Strait, I could not help but feel a profound sense of temporal displacement. As a member of the generation born after the lifting of martial law and raised under modern civic education, I truly want to ask the KMT: “Do you not see who the true villain is?” In 1949, the Chinese Communist Party used a bloody civil war to drive the KMT into exile in Taiwan. In the decades that followed, it has sought to completely erase the existence
President William Lai (賴清德) on Sunday congratulated Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi and her Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) on their historic landslide victory in Japan’s general election. The LDP secured the largest single-party majority in post-World War II Japan, winning 316 seats. The win is expected to strengthen ties with Japan’s allies and potentially deter Chinese aggression in the region. American Institute in Taiwan Director Raymond Greene on Monday said that under Takaichi’s leadership, he anticipates deeper coordination among the US, Japan and Taiwan to promote regional stability and prosperity. US President Donald Trump has also shown his strong support for Takaichi,