On Sept. 25, the Taiwan Higher Education Union held a press conference to release the results of a questionnaire in which respondents were asked to assess the university evaluation system.
As many as 80 percent of the university teachers who responded to the survey said that the system has trapped Taiwan’s higher education in a formalistic approach that encourages falsification.
While seriously impinging on the time that lecturers would otherwise devote to teaching and research, the system has also failed to improve the quality of students’ education.
Some teachers even said that in order to meet the requirements of the university evaluation system they had to resort to falsifying data and requiring students to play along with this.
Unfortunately, the Ministry of Education has paid little attention to the results of the union’s survey. It simply responded with poor excuses and argued that any university evaluation system inevitably has its blind spots. The ministry insists that since the second evaluation cycle has already begun it must proceed according to the timetable.
None of the elements of the university evaluation system, from establishing the Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council to setting evaluation standards and modes of operation, have resulted from a process of democratic discussion. Some universities have even instituted absurd practices such as telling students to memorize their schools’ mottoes and goals.
The evaluation system’s unitary and standardized indices cause universities and teachers in different fields, departments, positions and locations to all be assessed according to the same standards.
As a result, rigid evaluation reports and complex administrative procedures are choking off the energy of Taiwan’s higher education, while teachers are being bogged down by formalistic evaluation work as if they were taking part in an essay-writing contest.
Moreover, the evaluation system provides under-par school authorities with the means to oppress teachers and even get rid of those who hold dissident opinions.
Taiwan’s higher education evaluation system is market-oriented, and there was no democratic discussion held when the system was being set up.
In its implementation, the system fails to protect teachers’ academic freedom and labor rights. It also undermines the right of students to education, while creating a hierarchical power structure on university campuses.
The system is to blame for the loss of public spirit in Taiwan’s higher education and serious flaws have been laid bare for everyone who works in higher education to see.
Such concerns prompted teachers who care about the future of Taiwan’s higher education and friends worried about the way it has been going to join protests in front of the ministry on Sep. 28, Teachers’ Day.
All those who took part were united in calling for the ministry to suspend the university evaluation system and subject it to a thorough review.
Chen Shu-han is director of the Taiwan Higher Education Union’s office.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has a good reason to avoid a split vote against the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in next month’s presidential election. It has been here before and last time things did not go well. Taiwan had its second direct presidential election in 2000 and the nation’s first ever transition of political power, with the KMT in opposition for the first time. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was ushered in with less than 40 percent of the vote, only marginally ahead of James Soong (宋楚瑜), the candidate of the then-newly formed People First Party (PFP), who got almost 37
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) has called on his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) counterpart, William Lai (賴清德), to abandon his party’s Taiwanese independence platform. Hou’s remarks follow an article published in the Nov. 30 issue of Foreign Affairs by three US-China relations academics: Bonnie Glaser, Jessica Chen Weiss and Thomas Christensen. They suggested that the US emphasize opposition to any unilateral changes in the “status quo” across the Taiwan Strait, and that if Lai wins the election, he should consider freezing the Taiwanese independence clause. The concept of de jure independence was first
Many news reports about the Israel-Hamas war highlight casualties, deaths, and destruction. Journalists rarely delve into how either society has responded and mobilized to deal with the war. This article provides a brief view of how Israel and Israelis have reacted to the war as individuals, groups, and as a nation. A useful template for Taiwan to prepare for a potential future conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is how Israelis self-organized to deal with this crisis. Prior to the Hamas terrorist attack on Oct. 7, Israelis were even more polarized about public policy than the US or Taiwan.
Following the failure of the proposed “blue-white alliance,” New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi named Broadcasting Corp of China (BCC) chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) as his running mate on the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential ticket, while the other prospective half of the alliance, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), named TPP Legislator Cynthia Wu (吳欣盈). The result is a three-horse race, which is getting tighter. Hou and Ko are likely to put all their focus on being seen as the top challenger to Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidate, to