In light of the nation’s deteriorating finances, with mounting national debts and low tax revenues, one would think the government would be more prudent in spending taxpayers’ money.
Hearing President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) lecture his officials to handle the government’s finances more efficiently and seek solutions to the nation’s financial problems, many thought the central government would lead by example.
Regrettably, recent incidents suggest otherwise. Instead of being thriftier, it appears the Ma administration can be quite a spendthrift when it comes to dispensing taxpayers’ hard-earned money while lining the pockets of its own officials and that of the big conglomerates.
For example, on Thursday last week, at the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) board meeting, aside from confirming the appointment of Lin Join-sane (林中森) as the new SEF chairman, it also amended its organizational regulations to change the position from one without remuneration to one paying nearly NT$300,000 (US$10,235) a month.
Similarly, Minister of Economic Affairs Shih Yen-shiang (施顏祥) announced on Friday that his ministry was planning to launch a NT$1 billion subsidy program to encourage domestic consumers to buy LED bulbs. Shih said the ministry was considering offering about NT$200 for the purchase of each LED bulb.
Granted, the ministry may have the good intention of making the products more affordable and promoting environmental awareness, but taking into account the recent wrangling over the issue of the minimum wage — after a raise in the minimum wage that would have given people just enough money to buy an additional tea egg each day was rejected — many can’t help but be disheartened and question whether the LED subsidy program is just another way for the government to profit the big conglomerates.
As for changing the job of SEF chairman to a paid position, how much more brazen can the Ma government get?
The SEF said the change was made in response to the “new cross-strait situation.” The question this assertion raises is: Exactly what “new situation” is the SEF talking about?
In case the Ma government needs a reminder: The nation’s debt has ballooned from about NT$1.2 trillion when the Democratic Progressive Party government left office in 2008 to nearly NT$5 trillion four years later.
Data from the National Treasury Agency showed that the per capita national debt was NT$216,000 and that, as of the end of July, the central government was carrying a long-term — more than one year — debt of NT$4.8745 trillion, to be exact.
“It is important for us to be thriftier. Finding ways to generate more revenue is crucial, too,” Ma said as recently as July at the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) weekly Central Standing Committee meeting, during which Minister of Finance Chang Sheng-ford (張盛和) was invited to report on the state of the nation’s finances.
However, observing the action of his government, it appears Ma cannot practice what he preaches and cannot empathize at all with what people are enduring.
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
On Tuesday, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) issued a statement criticizing Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a student from Shanghai’s Fudan University, saying she had offended the sensibilities of Taiwanese. It also called for the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation — established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — which had organized the tour group, to remind group members to be careful with their statements. Song, during a visit to a baseball stadium in Taichung, said that the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team (中國台北隊) ... we wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only