The use of working holidays
I am writing in reference to working holidays which have been much discussed recently.
Over the past few years I have taught Japanese language and culture to a number of young Taiwanese men who were preparing to go to Japan for a working holiday.
All these men were working as chefs at a Japanese restaurant in Taiwan, but hoped to improve their skills and sense of service by working in a more sophisticated working environment in Japan. None of these men had graduated from college.
In fact, some of them were junior-high school graduates from very modest backgrounds.
They were happy in their current jobs, but wanted very much to broaden their horizon and skills in a country more developed than Taiwan.
In some cases, they were willing to pay for a referral fee (of up to one month’s salary) to find employment in a fine dining establishment — something that is very difficult even for skilled Japanese restaurant workers without the right connections.
I think the Working Holiday is a fine idea for these ambitious people.
How else would somebody with just a junior-high school diploma be able to learn new skills, earn money, travel and make friends outside of their small circle in Taiwan?
Some of my students have come back from their year in Japan, and they tell me about the incredibly long hours and hard work during their time abroad.
They also tell me about some of the unfortunate things that happened, perhaps due to the language barrier or cultural misunderstandings.
However, they all came back with a new sense of pride and felt that they had achieved something valuable and not easily translatable into purely monetary terms.
I applaud these young men, and hope that the program could be expanded to many others from all backgrounds.
In addition, I think it might be useful to conduct an exit interview after participants of working holidays come back to Taiwan, because although the stories are anecdotal, they could be useful for the development of the working holiday program to give an insight in to what participants truly thought of and gained from the program.
Australia’s decades-long battle to acquire a new French-designed attack submarine to replace its aging Collins class fleet bears all the hallmarks of a bureaucratic boondoggle. The Attack-class submarine project, initially estimated to cost A$20 billion to A$25 billion (US$15.6 billion to US$19.5 billion at the current exchange rate), had by 2016 doubled to A$50 billion, and almost doubled again to A$90 billion by February last year. Because of delays, the French-led Naval Group consortium would not begin cutting steel on the first submarine until 2024, which means the first vessel would not be operational until after 2030 — and the last
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Wei-chou (林為洲) talked about “opposing the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]” in a recent Facebook post, writing that opposing the CCP is not the special reserve of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Not long after, many people within the KMT received a mysterious letter signed “Chinese Nationalist Party Central Committee” containing what looked like a declaration of opposition to, and a call to arms against, the CCP. Unexpectedly, the KMT’s Culture and Communications Committee came forward with a clarification, saying that the letter was not sent by the KMT and telling the public not to believe
When Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called for a reset of bilateral relations with the US, a White House spokesperson replied that Washington saw the relationship as one of strong competition that required a position of strength. It is clear that US President Joe Biden’s administration is not simply reversing former US Donald Trump’s policies. Citing Thucydides’ attribution of the Peloponnesian War to Sparta’s fear of a rising Athens, some analysts believe the US-China relationship is entering a period of conflict pitting an established hegemon against an increasingly powerful challenger. I am not that pessimistic. In my view, economic
I am just getting around to reading Dr. Chang Hsien-yi’s (張憲義) oral history published in 2016 entitled Nuclear Bomb! Spy? CIA (核彈! 間諜? CIA). Dr. Chang’s defection to the Central Intelligence Agency 33 years ago is one of the reasons that Taiwan does not have a nuclear deterrent today in the face of yet another Formosa Strait Crisis, and from his book, I can see that Dr. Chang still has strong views on the subject. In the Second Formosa Strait Crisis from August to October 1958, the United States deflected Sino-Soviet aggression against the offshore islands of Quemoy (金門) and Matsu