The use of working holidays
I am writing in reference to working holidays which have been much discussed recently.
Over the past few years I have taught Japanese language and culture to a number of young Taiwanese men who were preparing to go to Japan for a working holiday.
All these men were working as chefs at a Japanese restaurant in Taiwan, but hoped to improve their skills and sense of service by working in a more sophisticated working environment in Japan. None of these men had graduated from college.
In fact, some of them were junior-high school graduates from very modest backgrounds.
They were happy in their current jobs, but wanted very much to broaden their horizon and skills in a country more developed than Taiwan.
In some cases, they were willing to pay for a referral fee (of up to one month’s salary) to find employment in a fine dining establishment — something that is very difficult even for skilled Japanese restaurant workers without the right connections.
I think the Working Holiday is a fine idea for these ambitious people.
How else would somebody with just a junior-high school diploma be able to learn new skills, earn money, travel and make friends outside of their small circle in Taiwan?
Some of my students have come back from their year in Japan, and they tell me about the incredibly long hours and hard work during their time abroad.
They also tell me about some of the unfortunate things that happened, perhaps due to the language barrier or cultural misunderstandings.
However, they all came back with a new sense of pride and felt that they had achieved something valuable and not easily translatable into purely monetary terms.
I applaud these young men, and hope that the program could be expanded to many others from all backgrounds.
In addition, I think it might be useful to conduct an exit interview after participants of working holidays come back to Taiwan, because although the stories are anecdotal, they could be useful for the development of the working holiday program to give an insight in to what participants truly thought of and gained from the program.
Vickie Wu
Taipei
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS