It is becoming less lucrative to invest in the local stock market, particularly for individual investors, given the heavier cost burden. On Saturday, the Department of Health (DOH) finalized a new and controversial healthcare premium rule that includes getting an extra 2 percent payment from dividend income earned by individual investors.
The latest national healthcare premium package is set to take effect in January after the Cabinet rubber-stamps the health department’s proposal, along with the restarting of a tax on capital gains primarily on profits from stock trading.
Share prices may not see an immediate and significant setback as a result of the new healthcare premium rule because institutional and foreign investors are exempt from allocating a slice of their dividend income. Foreign institutions are the major investors in local stocks, owning more than 33 percent of shares worth nearly NT$7 trillion (US$238 billion) based on a Taiwan Stock Exchange tally last Monday.
However, the estimated increase of NT$20 billion in healthcare premium revenue, which the DOH considers crucial to help save the nation’s crumbling insurance system from bankruptcy for another five years, will inevitably come at the expense of diminishing daily turnover on the local stock markets.
This impact, possibly a gradual erosion, will result from a new wave of retail investors exiting the market as they are vulnerable to a rise in investment costs and the extra payments will further squeeze their profits after the tax on capital gains was approved by lawmakers in July.
Now, there are more reasons to jump ship to more lucrative investment tools. Retail investors own 60 percent of the shares listed on the local stock market. The health department expects more than 3.45 million investors will be affected by the payment rule.
The TAIEX closed up 0.41 percent on Friday with a turnover of NT$86 billion. Turnover has been below the healthy level of NT$100 billion during most trading days since early this year, overshadowed by the capital gains tax.
The likelihood of a significant correction may be slim as the 2 percent levy on dividend income looks insubstantial and there is a NT$5,000 threshold, up from the DOH’s original proposal of NT$2,000.
However, it is certain that the healthcare payment rule will deal a blow to investors’ confidence.
Besides, the latest payment scheme is not fair by any standards, as only retail stock investors have to pay. It is even questionable whether stock dividends should be considered an income as companies pay additional shares via stock splits, which increase the total number of the issuing company’s shares, while lowering the price of each share without changing its market capitalization, or the total value of the shares held.
In other words, stock dividends are not equal to any kind of income, apart from those where the stock price rose prior to a stock split.
Retail investors are not the only group that are going to pay higher fees for healthcare coverage, but also people who earn extra income by taking part-time jobs to make ends meet.
People with annual interest income that exceeds NT$5,000 from their bank saving accounts will have to pay more healthcare premium, including retirees who rely solely on the interest for their living expenses.
The government is seeking a capital injection primarily from ordinary people, adding to the burden they face already trying to make ends meet. The new rule comes at a time when the average monthly wage has stagnated, while living expenses climb amid rising inflation.
It may make the insurance system healthier for a while, but it will sicken the economy.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS