Tianjin Mayor Huang Xingguo (黃興國) is in Taiwan this week on a visit he says is about “making friends, meeting relatives, paying tribute to Matsu and forging cooperative ties with Taiwan.” As that is case, I wonder if he would be willing to talk to Taiwanese businesspeople who have been cheated and robbed while investing in Tianjin.
In 1992, 30-year old Taiwanese businessman Shen Po-sheng (沈柏勝) went to Tianjin to invest in a decorative plywood factory co-owned by the Tianjin City Government. After the machinery and equipment had been installed, personnel trained and technology transferred, Shen was ejected from the business. To secure the return of the 1 million yuan (US$157,000) he lent the company, Shen initiated legal proceedings and won. Unfortunately, he was never informed of his victory and the money was instead split between two judges and the Chinese Communist Party.
However, 18 years of petitioning, filing official complaints, trying to use connections and going to court bankrupted Shen, and his father died as a result, as Shen was unable to pay for the medical care his father needed. On May 1, 2009, with all his hopes gone, Shen tried to commit suicide in front of Tiananmen in Beijing.
That incident finally attracted the attention of the Chinese authorities, but it still took another two years before Shen received some of his money back.
What I cannot understand is why the Chinese government has still not punished those who stole from Shen, the judges who divided the booty up among themselves or the civil servants who conspired with them.
In 1987, Taiwanese businessman Kuo Meng-tie (郭夢垤) was employed by Jixian County in Tianjin to attract Taiwanese businesspeople to the area. Kuo had a house built in Tulou village in Tianjin’s Chengguan Township. However, the building ended up being registered under the name of village party secretary Yan Guangcheng (閻廣成). Although Kuo challenged the legality of the registration, he died before any changes were made to the ownership of the property. His son is now fighting the case, but the authorities have ignored his complaints.
In 1993, Taiwanese businessman Huang Ching-ken (黃清根) invested 23 million yuan as sole investor in a food company in Tianjin. In the process of purchasing raw materials and “entertaining” business associates, he incurred debts of 300,000 yuan. Tianjin City judge Lu Shaohe (盧紹和) then ordered that all the company’s assets should be confiscated to repay the debt.
Before the verdict was enforced, Huang came up with the 300,000 yuan, but Lu rejected his attempt to pay the debt.
Why does the Tianjin City Government allow the city’s judges to harm Taiwanese businesspeople in this way?
There was also the case of 90-year-old agricultural expert Yang Fu-cheng (楊馥成), who was fleeced while working with the Tianjin Hospital of Armed Police Corps.
Ten years ago, Taiwanese businessman Lee Tung (李董) and a Japanese invested NT$200 million (US$6.7 million) in an LCD TV assembly factory together with the Tianjin City Government. Two years later, Lee was thrown in prison for eight years and, needless to say, all the money he had invested vanished.
These cases are just the tip of the iceberg and I cannot see why the Tianjin City Government allows its officials to keep exploiting Taiwanese businesspeople like this.
During his visit to Taiwan, Huang should be asked to explain these cases, which have clearly strained the relationship between Tianjin and Taiwan.
William Kao is president of the Victims of Investment in China Association.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Over the past few years, migrant workers’ rights have improved in Taiwan, but there has not been a comparable improvement in protections for employers, who are faced with a range of challenges, such as family nurses mistreating patients or workers threatening to change brokers or demanding that employers change their jobs. Then there is the decrease in work standards. Migrant workers too often find the lure of the underground jobs market irresistible, are unaware of employment laws and regulations, or have found that National Immigration Agency (NIA) checks are lax, and as a result abscond. If this happens, what protections or
The Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) has been giving daily COVID-19 updates for almost four months, and on several occasions when major developments have arisen, the news conferences have attracted large numbers of viewers. The entire nation is anxious about the pandemic, and interest in the latest news has become a part of daily life. Watching the center’s daily news conferences has become something of a national ritual. The pandemic has stabilized within Taiwan due to the admirable efforts of each person living in the nation conducting themselves with the utmost responsibility, and in certain cases making considerable sacrifices within their
This year marks the 75th anniversary of the end of World War II. In that war’s aftermath, novelist George Orwell produced two prophetic works. The first, Animal Farm, was published in August 1945; the second, Nineteen Eighty-Four, came out in June 1949. Both still ring true and cover a wide range of messages, including even how the mid-sized nation of Taiwan achieved its democracy and why it still maintains an outlier status in a COVID-19 world. With its full planetary scope, WWII left untold millions dead and injured, cities were destroyed and the future path of most nations was altered. New
United States Senator “Kit” Bond (R-MO) was a real leader on Asia policy during his time in Congress. Like most senators, he had a ready one-liner for every occasion. The one I never tired of hearing is “Well, looks like everything has been said. The problem is not everyone has said it.” It’s sort of like with US-China great power competition. There is not much new to say. This is especially true because it’s largely a story of what’s already happened: BRI, Made in China 2025, aggression in the South China Sea, provocations on the Indian border, cyber-hacks, erosion of “one country,