The theme song for the leaders of the Pacific Command and its army, air force, marine and navy components might well be the catchy tune On the Road Again by country singer Willie Nelson.
For years, the commanders — headquartered in Hawaii — have traveled extensively around the Asia-Pacific region to foster alliances and partnerships. Today, that duty has taken on fresh urgency with the administration of US President Barack Obama whose “pivot” aims to prioritise security operations in this part of the world.
Moreover, because all US military services are experiencing reductions in forces and budgets mandated by the need to cut government spending, the US must seek support from Asian nations and get them to take up some of the slack.
Although US officers do not say much about it in public, they are increasingly competing with a rising China for influence in Asia. Longer term, the US hopes to deter a potentially aggressive China by cultivating working relations with other armed forces.
Admiral Samuel Locklear, the new Pacific commander, told the US Congress recently that “the Chinese and other people in that part of the world need to recognize that we do have US national security interests there.”
US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta underscored the commanders’ mission in Hawaii during a stop in the remote US state last week on his way to Singapore for the annual Shangri-La Dialogue of Asian defense ministers and military chiefs.
“More than ever,” Panetta said, “Hawaii remains that key center for operations throughout the Asia-Pacific region.”
Panetta, who was in Honolulu in March to preside over the change of command from Admiral Robert Willard to Locklear, said Willard had excelled as a diplomat who “demonstrated the power of relationships [and] how to turn those relationships into partnerships, into alliances, and ….true and lasting friendships.” He suggested that Locklear continue on the same course.
A particular responsibility for engaging Asian military leaders falls on the US Army’s leader, Lieutenant General Francis Wiercinski, because the army is the dominant military service in most Asian nations and an army officer is the chief of most of the Asian defense staffs.
So far this year, Wiercinski has visited Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea (twice), Bangladesh, Nepal, India, the Philippines and Malaysia. At each stop, he typically met with the country’s chief of defense and the head of the army plus the US ambassador and the defense attache.
On these trips the general was sometimes invited to meet the defense minister or the nation’s political leader. In addition, he was asked to address a war college or to observe training. In March, Wiercinski also traveled to Washington and Fort Knox, Kentucky. All told, he was in his office at Fort Shafter for only four hours that month.
Similarly, the commander of the Pacific Air Forces, General Gary North, spends 60 percent to 70 percent of his time nurturing partnerships in the Asia-Pacific region. He meets with top officers in Asian air forces, senior defense officials and political leaders. Occasionally he is asked to meet with civic and business leaders.
The general flew to Mongolia to talk with military leaders and watch a parachute jump, to Vietnam to further the US reconciliation with that one-time enemy and received a visit from senior Thai officers at his headquarters in Hawaii. North took in a military air show in Singapore, dropped in on the Pacific island nation of Palau and attended another air show in New Zealand.
In the past six months, the commanding general of the Marines in the Pacific, Lieutenant General Duane Thiessen, has spent more than half his time seeking to open Asian doors, arranging combined training with Asian armed forces and occasionally representing the Pacific commander.
Thiessen has been in Japan for a seminar with Japan’s Ground Self-Defense Force leaders, Indonesia for an international dialogue, Singapore to meet with senior officers and Thailand to assess the extensive Cobra Gold exercise. He went to Tonga to attend the funeral of King George Tupou V.
In East Timor, he met with leaders of the security forces. In Australia, he talked with civil and military leaders and inspected the first unit to land in Darwin under a new agreement to rotate marines there. In the Philippines, he took part in an exercise with senior Philippine officers and checked on Balikatan, a US-Philippine exercise.
Until he retired recently, Admiral Patrick Walsh, commander of the Pacific Fleet, traveled to Asia a bit less than the others, averaging a trip every other month. A staff officer said: “The US Navy maintains the largest and most robust presence in the Asia-Pacific region. Admiral Walsh thought it important to spend more time in Washington talking with Navy and Defense Department leaders.”
Walsh, however, spent a month in Japan in charge of the US relief effort after the earthquake and tsunami and nuclear leak that caused so much death and damage in March last year. His replacement at Pearl Harbor, Admiral Cecil Haney, said that “together with our allies and partners, we will continue our commitment to maritime security.”
These commanders are able to travel far because their aircraft can fly long distances and are equipped with superb communications to stay in touch with their headquarters and the Pentagon. They can send and receive secret and open messages, scrambled and open telephone calls and use secret and open Internet connections.
If they wanted to, they or the staff traveling with them could even tune in to Willie Nelson strumming his guitar and singing: “And I can’t wait to get on the road again.”
Richard Halloran is a commentator based in Hawaii.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,