The Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) has over the years taken a number of initiatives to help protect the environment and the latest effort to make Taiwan more energy-efficient has seen drivers forbidden from leaving vehicles idling for more than three minutes.
The amendment to the Air Pollution Control Act (空氣污染防治法) introduced on March 1, which took effect this month, requires drivers to turn off their engines if they stay in the same spot for more than three minutes. Violators can be fined NT$1,500 for motorcycles, NT$3,000 for cars and NT$5,000 for larger vehicles.
The new regulation is a positive step aimed at reducing carbon emissions. However, it is also an impractical policy that could simply resulted in the harassment of the public and further burden law enforcement officers.
On Friday, when the law took effect, local environmental protection departments sent 180 people out to conduct on-site inspections at major tourist attractions, schools, hospitals, hotels, train stations and shopping malls. While more than 2,000 warnings were issued to drivers of stationary vehicles with running engines, no fines were handed out.
The EPA acknowledged that it is difficult to issue tickets as the law states that inspectors are required to use an ultra-ray inspection camera to monitor vehicle tailpipes for three minutes before fining violators.
Under such complicated inspection procedures, most drivers will simply turn off their engines or drive away when they realize they are being monitored. Limited manpower in environmental protection departments nationwide, coupled with unrealistic inspection conditions, means the ban could become one of those policies that is never enforced despite the legislation’s well-meaning ambitions.
As a taxi driver said when asked to comment, the policy was drafted by officials who sit around in air-conditioned buildings all day.
Before any drivers are fined for violating the regulation, the ban is already being slammed by some sections of the public. Taxi drivers, in particular, have said the ban will hurt business as switching off the engine while waiting for customers will turn their vehicles into ovens in the summertime.
Environmental Protection Administration Minister Stephen Shen (沈世宏) admitted that the there is room for improvement regarding the details of the law and has said his agency will hold meetings with taxi associations to discuss whether to relax the time limit it imposes on them.
The government should be focusing its energies on programs that instruct or encourage major taxi and bus companies to replace old heavily polluting vehicles with lower emission versions.
To improve the country’s air quality, the EPA should pay greater attention to the petroleum and chemicals industry that is responsible for emitting massive levels of carbon.
The government should also step up its efforts to educate and encourage greater use of public transportation. Building better national public transportation networks would increase people’s willingness to use these services and reduce the number of cars and scooters currently clogging the roads.
Promoting a green environment with low carbon emissions is important. In the case of emissions from idling vehicles, warnings and persuading drivers to stop should help. However, a ban with impractical inspection procedures and fines will only invite further public criticism.
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
Taiwanese men doing their alternative military service within Taipei’s and Taichung’s Department of Compulsory Military Service independently reported outlandish incidents of brainwashing. Below is a story related to propagandizing as it manifests overseas. One of my Chinese friends and a group of Taiwanese friends set off together from Sydney, Australia, in a tour group to northern Europe. The travel agency arranged for a Chinese tour guide to lead the group. The guide would start off on a propaganda blitz every afternoon at a set time, singing the praises of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The Taiwanese members of the tour seemed