Law-abiding citizens dutifully played their roles as actors in society’s grand narrative when they filed their tax returns as the financial year came to a close on Thursday. However, in view of recent media reports about the conduct of high-ranking officials, many taxpayers are no doubt shaking their heads in disgust and irritation over how their hard-earned money is being frittered away by the government.
Public Administration 101: Civil servants are on the taxpayers’ payroll and their job description calls for them to serve the people.
Taxpayers consequently expect Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien (王建煊), for example, to perform his duty as head of the nation’s watchdog by keeping a close eye on the executive branch and launch investigations when irregularities arise.
Instead, what the public is treated to every time Wang’s name hits the headlines are his views on everything and anything except the issues which are actually relevant to the Control Yuan’s functions. There is a distinct lack of stories about his agency tackling major cases.
After causing a stir in 2010 with his loquacity while talking to reporters about his views on sex, Wang made headlines again earlier this week with comments about women’s breasts. In his new book Where to Find Justice? Wang wrote: “If big breasts are fake, it feels weird to touch them; it feels uncomfortable and meaningless.” It is difficult to overstate the extent to which people have been amazed at Wang’s ineptitude as a public servant.
Since taking the helm of the Control Yuan in August 2008, Wang has published six books. If he has the time to write so many books, many wonder why he does not seem to have time to do what is actually required of him by investigating issues such as the public’s increasing concern about Taipower’s management inefficiency, the lack of transparency in the company’s pricing and purchasing contracts with independent power producers and allegations of price gouging in the wake of the government’s decision to allow increases in fuel and electricity prices, for example.
If Wang is really so enthusiastic about giving lectures on sex and relationships, he would do well to quit his job so that taxpayers’ money could actually pay for someone who is serious about the job and will effectively monitor the government’s actions and probe malfeasance by government officials at all levels.
Another cause for taxpayer disgust is the leadership of Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌).
The city government’s victory in its bid to host the 2017 Summer Universiade is certainly an honor, and for this achievement it must be applauded. However, is the city government fraudulently billing taxpayers underneath the facade of the games? This question is floating in many minds due to the gigantic budget the city government has proposed for the event.
After initially suggesting a budget of NT$35 billion (US$1.17 billion) in October last year, the Hau administration raised the amount to NT$37.5 billion after the International University Sports Federation announced in November that the city had won the bid to host the games. The budget was then further increased to NT$48.7 billion in a report presented by Hau in April this year. In other words, in less than six months, the proposed budget for hosting the games has increased by NT$13.7 billion, or nearly 40 percent.
Many cannot help but become suspicious about whether Hau is taking the public as fools by having taxpayers foot the bill to fulfill his vanity and his fondness for extravagance and excess.
In view of the deteriorating national finances — a fact often stated by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — it is utterly disturbing to see how taxpayers’ money is being used by a government which has seemingly failed to make every hard-earned penny count.
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms
RSS