When Italians said good riddance to former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, it turned out that they were ready for more than just a political change. Since Berlusconi stepped down last year, returning to life as a media mogul, the digital era finally seems to have dawned in Italy.
Berlusconi’s TV company, Mediaset, an analog-era powerhouse that continued to dominate the Italian media scene well into his 17-year sojourn in or near the prime minister’s villa, has suffered greatly since he left office for the third and presumably final time. Advertising has fallen, earnings have plunged and more Italians are tuning in to alternatives like Sky Italia, the satellite TV broadcaster owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp.
Perhaps even more striking is the way Italians are turning to the Web. Italy remains well behind most Western European countries in the reach of the Internet, in part because of policies Berlusconi pursued to protect his business empire, rivals and critics say. However, the spirit of change in Rome, ushered in by Berlusconi’s successor, Mario Monti, seems to have awakened Italians to the potential of the Web to make a difference.
Last week, Internet campaigners for greater transparency in Italian government claimed a small victory when the lower house of parliament, the Italian Chamber of Deputies, delayed a scheduled vote on the membership of the Authority for Communications Guarantees, or AGCOM, which regulates the media and telecommunications, including the Internet.
In a break from the past, when members of such commissions were appointed via backroom deals, Gianfranco Fini, president of the chamber, announced that candidates would have to file resumes, so that their applications could be considered on merit.
“For the first time in Italian history, the party system has given up making appointments in the dark, with no official candidates, and has instead accepted the principle of transparency and competence in decisionmaking,” proclaimed the Open Media Coalition, a group that has been calling for more openness in the selection process for AGCOM and other regulatory panels dealing with media issues. These include the data protection agency and the board of RAI, the Italian public broadcaster.
The push for more transparency in the regulatory process in Rome came as another Internet phenomenon, the blogger and comedian Beppe Grillo, was scoring his first big political successes. Candidates in Grillo’s Five Star Movement won mayoral elections last week in Parma and several smaller towns, riding a wave of Facebook and Twitter-fueled anger over corruption and business as usual.
Criticism of the selection process had ranged far and wide. Frank La Rue, the UN special rapporteur on the promotion of freedom of expression, recently wrote to the government, asking it to carry out public consultations on the nominations.
The selection of the new media and telecommunications regulator has attracted such broad interest because it is seen as a test of how much power Berlusconi still wields behind the scenes. Rivals of Mediaset have long complained that when he was prime minister, regulators favored his company and another politically connected giant, Telecom Italia. Several rival telecommunications companies, including Vodafone Italia, FastWeb and Wind, boycotted a recent farewell speech by the current head of the regulatory panel, Corrado Calabro, whose mandate expires in July.
AGCOM’s decisions will play an important role in shaping Italian society in a post-Berlusconi era. Among other things, it is in charge of ensuring fair news media coverage of elections scheduled for next year. It will also oversee an auction of new digital TV frequencies, measures to deal with Internet piracy and efforts to promote broadband penetration.
Until Fini announced the delay of the vote, there was widespread speculation in the Italian media that the favorite for the job of AGCOM president was Roberto Viola, who now holds the top staff position at the commission as secretary-general. Viola is seen as having the necessary credentials, but rivals of Mediaset are against naming him president because of his involvement in decisions that were seen as helping the company during the Berlusconi years.
Last year, Sky Italia, the biggest pay-TV company in Italy, pulled out of a “beauty contest” to award new digital TV frequencies. The company complained that the AGCOM staff had drawn up guidelines that ensured that Mediaset and RAI, which offer mostly free TV, would win.
Rivals of Telecom Italia say the existing AGCOM has permitted big increases in the fees that Telecom Italia charges them to gain access to its network, costing them hundreds of millions of euros. They argue that Italy’s low broadband penetration rate — in January last year there were 21.9 lines per 100 residents, compared with a EU average of 26.5 connections, according to the union’s statistics agency — is attributable in part to Telecom Italia’s hold on the market.
“It seems obvious to question how it could not occur to AGCOM president Corrado Calabro, lamenting the low penetration of Internet in Italy, that perhaps those price increases undermined the growth of broadband in Italy,” FastWeb said in a statement.
Mediaset, Telecom Italia and Sky Italia declined to comment for this article.
Given the entrenched positions and the close political allegiances, picking a candidate satisfactory to all sides will not be easy, analysts say.
“It’s very difficult to find someone with experience in the sector who is not pro or against Mediaset,” said Augusto Preta, general manager of ITMedia Consulting, a research firm in Rome.
Amid the Internet-driven push for greater openness in government, the job of AGCOM president has attracted interest from political outsiders. Stefano Quintarelli, a technology entrepreneur who most recently served as the head of digital operations at Il Sole 24 Ore, a business newspaper, has mounted an Internet campaign for the post, receiving more than 12,000 signatures to an online petition supporting his candidacy.
“I think I have a vision of the market and the technical skills that could be helpful at AGCOM,” Quintarelli said. “I think my nomination could be an encouragement to the young people of Italy who believe in merit.”
Quintarelli’s candidacy was endorsed by the Internet Society of Italy, which said in a statement that “500 years ago he would have been one of the protagonists of the Italian Renaissance.”
Analysts say, however, that Quintarelli is a long-shot choice; despite the move toward greater openness, it is likely that the job will go to someone with better connections, even if it is not someone with links to Berlusconi.
Even before the process of forming a new AGCOM began, there were signs that the regulatory environment could become more challenging for Mediaset. Monti’s government reversed plans this year to offer the digital TV frequencies free, deciding instead on an auction.
Business conditions have also turned against Mediaset. In a recessionary economy, many Italian media companies have suffered, but Mediaset has fared worse than some of its rivals, with domestic advertising sales falling 10 percent and net income down 85 percent in the first quarter. That is why analysts say Berlusconi, despite having bowed out of politics, is still following developments in Rome very closely, even if Italians have consigned him to their political history.
“It seems that television is the only subject that still interests him,” Preta said. “Mediaset is not doing well in the market. If he has no ability to influence AGCOM, he would be worse off.”
As the landscape changes, Italians are experiencing a long-awaited digital awakening.
“I think a lot of people don’t realize, given how bureaucratic Italy can be, that there are times when an entire market can change,” said a former Italian TV executive, who spoke on condition of anonymity because his current role included negotiations with policymakers.
“We are going through one of these times now,” he said.
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that