A number of people and organizations are encouraging commuters to use bicycles to go to work, especially now that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government under President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has decided to unfreeze fuel and energy price rises so soon after Ma’s re-election.
Among those organizations are the Taipei Cyclist Federation, bike commuter-friendly corporations that provide showers and changing facilities to their employees and, of course, bike shops. Conspicuously absent from this new bike craze, however, is the Taipei City Government, the Taipei MRT Corp and private bus companies in and around the city.
Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) seems to think of people who ride bicycles as just weekend enthusiasts, content to use the few bike paths available, which are often in need of repair. Nothing is being done to make the city’s roads safe for cycling, police do little to stop taxis and buses from overtaking and nearly crushing bikers, and there are no integrated traffic lanes for cyclists. The river paths are the safest place to ride in Taipei, but they often do not go near the business districts of the city, such as Xinyi District (信義).
The MRT Corp has the same kind of blinders on — it only allows people to bring bikes on the MRT during weekends, at certain stations and for a steep price. It would be impossible for a bicycle commuter to integrate the MRT into his or her commute during a regular work week. Nor is it possible with buses. In a city like Seattle, Washington, buses often have bike racks in front of their windshields for cyclists’ bikes. Not so in Taipei.
With fuel costs rising, more people will switch to pedal power, but it will likely not be sustainable except among avid bike enthusiasts. In most cases, office workers will try out bike commuting for a few days, maybe a few weeks, and then they will go back to relying on scooters, MRT trains or buses because of the daunting obstacles to bike commuting.
To really encourage mass bike commuting, as seen in Denmark or the Netherlands, where 30 percent of the workforce commutes by bicycle, the entire culture of the city needs to change.
The city government needs to dedicate lanes on roads to bicycles, and not just in the failed way that Hau did on Taipei’s Dunhua North and South Road in 2009, when a green lane on the side of the road meant to be a bike path turned instantly into a taxi parking, waiting and pick-up area.
Employers need to accommodate their bicycle commuting employees by giving them a place to change their clothes and even installing showers in public restrooms.
Public transportation firms need to give commuters a viable option for carrying their bikes on buses and trains so they can be integrated into long-distance commuting. Imagine a commuter who lives in Tamshui (淡水), New Taipei City (新北市), riding every day to Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖) without using the MRT.
The commuters themselves also need to realize that they are going to get sweaty, dirty and wet when cycling to and from work. They should dress accordingly, and make sure they have extra changes of clothing in their office.
Getting major portions of a workforce to commute by bicycle is not just a pipe dream — it can and has been done. However, it takes hard work, support from the government and responsible employers. There is no better time than now to start realizing this dream.
US President Joe Biden’s administration continues to build on the unprecedented efforts of former US president Donald Trump’s team to deepen US relations with Taiwan. Without either administration explicitly declaring it, their combined policies have effectively transformed Washington’s ritualistic “one China” formula, while paying it deferential lip service. The two administrations have instituted policies that de facto nullify one of the “three noes” that then-US president Bill Clinton affirmed during his 1998 visit to Beijing: no Taiwanese independence; no “two Chinas”; no “one China, one Taiwan”; and no participation in most international organizations. (Actually four noes.) Last month, Washington opened a new
Despite the complicated legacy of colonialism, relations between Taipei and Tokyo continue to blossom in these troubled times. As East Asia continues to battle the COVID-19 pandemic and struggles to contain an increasingly aggressive China, our democratic archipelago benefits from a new high in its security relations with Japan. Remarkably, with its generous vaccine diplomacy and the unprecedented explicit mention of the situation surrounding Taiwan in Japan’s annual defense white paper, Tokyo began to embrace a novel, two-track, comprehensive approach for engaging Taiwan. The first track deals with non-traditional security such as public health and vaccine donations. Japan has generously supported
As the incursions by China into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone intensify, the international community’s anxiety has risen over the question of whether the US military would become directly involved in the case of an attack on Taiwan. Washington’s long-held policy of “strategic ambiguity” does little to ease the trepidation. The rationale universally espoused on “strategic ambiguity” is that an announced commitment from Washington to directly defend Taiwan would encourage Taiwanese independence and consequently bring forth a Chinese military attack and a possible nuclear confrontation between two superpowers. However, this line of argument could soon lose steam if the subject is viewed from
In an unprecedented move, a group of democratic nations led by the US, UK and EU in a joint statement on Tuesday accused the Chinese Ministry of State Security of having carried out a major cyberattack earlier this year and stealing data from at least 30,000 organizations worldwide, including governments, universities and firms in key industries. Western officials were reportedly perplexed by the attack’s brazen execution and unparalleled scale. In an article on the attack, BBC security correspondent Gordon Corera wrote: “Western spies are still struggling to understand why Chinese behavior has changed.” The attack raises the fear “that they [China]