Annexation coffin
The use of the word “coffin” in a Taipei Times editorial in regard to annexation was cruel, but real (“More nails in the annexation coffin,” Feb. 26, page 8). Liberty is as important as life. As 18th-century US statesman Patrick Henry said: “Give me liberty or give me death.”
In the Jan. 14 elections, less than 7 million voters virtually approved annexation and chose death instead of liberty, knowing that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) ambition is to achieve “eventual unification.”
It is a pity that the 6 million Taiwanese who did not vote for Ma or were too young to vote have to accept the election result — like it or not.
Taiwanese often complain that their destiny has been decided by foreigners. Historically, China’s Qing Dynasty Manchu rulers ceded Taiwan to Japan in 1895, the Japanese abandoned Taiwan like an orphan in 1945 and Americans have let the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule Taiwan under the Republic of China since 1945.
The KMT wanted Taiwanese to be anti-communist, called the Communist Chinese “Communist bandits” from 1945 to 1988 and imposed martial law for 38 years. In a sudden U-turn, in 2008, the KMT decided that from now on, Taiwanese must be pro-communist, treat Chinese leaders like their bosses and promote the policy that Taiwan is part of China.
The Communist Chinese, since 1949, have wanted to isolate and annex Taiwan and now threaten Taiwanese with missiles.
In contrast, the re-election of Ma was a free choice by Taiwanese — although Chinese and Americans interfered in the election. The 23 million Taiwanese have to face the consequences of their choice.
Recently, Ma said that “Taiwan will be completely different in four years.” For better or for worse, only Ma can tell what he means by “completely different.” Taiwanese have to watch every move that Ma and his administration make, in the open and behind closed doors.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question:
RSS