Like a bad poker player, China showed its hand over the weekend with its UN veto, alongside Russia, of a resolution calling for an end to the violence in Syria. Those vetos blocked any meaningful movement in the UN Security Council that could help put an end to months of horrific bloodshed directed at the Syrian people by their rulers.
On the day before the Chinese and Russian UN ambassadors vetoed a Western-backed resolution on Syria, forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad massacred hundreds of people in Homs, a restive city that has become a flashpoint of protest against the regime.
Western nations such as the US, France and the UK, as well as a number of Arab League members and Turkey are pushing hard to either get al-Assad to end the violence or to step down in favor of a successor government that could usher in reconciliation and end a slide into civil war that threatens the region.
However, their pressure has proven fruitless because without UN backing Syrian forces know there is little the rest of the world can do to stop them from massacring their people. That is why it is so important for nations to show a united front in pressuring al-Assad’s regime, with the backing of military power if necessary, to stop the killing.
Sadly, but almost predictably, China is not keen on backing this kind of united stance. In fact, Beijing will do whatever it can to block intervention in Syria, because if the rest of the world can intervene to stop an Arab regime from killing its citizens, what’s to stop that same grouping of countries from doing the same to China one day if Beijing again finds itself in the position where it feels it necessary to kill vast numbers of its own people?
When viewed in this context, China’s veto makes absolute sense. There is long-simmering anger in Tibet and Xinjiang that has flared up into open hostilities on several occassions. So far, Chinese forces have gotten away with killing relatively small numbers of so-called “insurgents,” but what if the situation deteriorates someday? What if an active rebellion does start in a western region of China?
As cold a calculation as it is, the Chinese leadership does not want their acquiescence to a UN Security Council resolution to be used against them for killing fellow citizens.
And that is the face on every card in China’s deck. The Chinese leadership believes they have the right to kill their own people if those people disagree with government policy. To back up this world view, they protect the right of nasty regimes worldwide to do the same. North Korea, Sudan, Syria, Myanmar, Sri Lanka — wherever a government kills its own people, China sends support through official silence, money, aid or arms.
Taiwanese business, political and military leaders should keep this in mind when contemplating accelerated economic ties, peace accords or military-to-military confidence-building mechanisms with China.
China’s ultimate goal with regards to Taiwan is to rule this nation, and Beijing’s veto against the recent Syria resolution shows what Chinese leaders think is a regime’s right to do to its own people.
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic