President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) new Cabinet will soon be up and running. Although its members might seem very pleased with themselves, it is imperative that they do not underestimate the serious challenges facing the nation. Given that the European debt crisis is likely to have only a passing impact on Taiwan, the fundamental challenge remains economic restructuring and the ability to play a meaningful role in international economic integration.
These issues require not only political will on the part of the government, but also a softer approach that makes optimal use of integration and coordination capabilities.
On Jan. 1, when Taiwan was still in the throes of election fever, the free-trade agreement (FTA) between the US and South Korea came into effect. The US removed import taxes on 82 percent of all product categories of South Korean exports to the US. South Korea’s FTA partners now account for 60 percent of the global economy
Seoul has signed nine free-trade deals, among them agreements with ASEAN, India, the EU and the US. It is also engaged in FTA talks with another seven economic entities, and talks with China and Japan are scheduled to begin later this year.
By comparison, Taiwan has signed agreements with five Central American states. The nation is currently discussing another agreement with Singapore, but the trade volume covered by these deals accounts for only 3.6 percent of Taiwan’s total foreign trade. Late last year, Taiwan and New Zealand announced that they were evaluating the feasibility of an economic cooperation agreement, but in terms of trade volume that will make up just 0.2 percent of total foreign trade.
Ma hopes that Taiwan will be able to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at some point in the next 10 years, but he still has not produced a plan to that end. Furthermore, given the speed at which East Asian economic integration is progressing, the question is whether Taiwan can afford to wait 10 years to join the TPP.
Taiwan’s ranking in the IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, improved from 18th in 2007 to 6th last year. However, a more realistic measure of national competitiveness would be to look at foreign investment, international capital flows and domestic investment in Taiwan.
In the three years after Ma’s election in 2008, annual real foreign investment fell by 50.8 percent, 33.4 percent and 29.1 percent, respectively. Even with the implementation of the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), foreign investment in Taiwan only increased by 7.6 percent last year, to US$3.4 billion. According to UN data, Taiwan’s foreign direct investment (FDI) as part of global FDI fell from 0.37 percent in 2007 to 0.31 percent in 2008, 0.25 percent in 2009 and 0.2 percent in 2010. This is less than the other three Asian tiger economies, and does not even amount to half of the FDI received by Vietnam.
A look at international capital flows, including both direct investment and securities investments, shows that Taiwan’s international competitive advantage is fast disappearing. Between 2000 and 2007, under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, average annual net international investment in Taiwan was a negative US$13.23 billion. Between 2008 and 2010, under the first Ma administration, the figure was a negative US$20.08 billion. During the first three quarters of last year, net international investment in Taiwan was a negative US$46.5 billion, a larger capital outflow than in any year in the past.
Taiwan’s domestic investment is increasingly losing its dynamism. During the 1990s, the real investment rate was 28 percent. During the eight years under the DPP it dropped to 23.7 percent. During Ma’s first four years in office, it fell further, to an annual average of 17.7 percent. Last year it remained low at 17.2 percent, the second-lowest on record.
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics has forecast that the real investment rate for this year will drop to 16.6 percent, which would be yet another historic low.
While the ECFA presented an opportunity for cross-strait integration, it is only a framework agreement and will not strengthen Taiwan’s export competitiveness. In 2007, Taiwan accounted for 10.6 percent of China’s import market, a number that by 2010 had shrunk to 8.3 percent. By the time the ECFA early harvest list came into effect early last year, that share had dropped to 7.2 percent, and by December last year, it had fallen still further, to 6.8 percent.
Faced with the challenges posed by globalization, the pressures on Taiwan’s international competitiveness have increased sharply. It can only be hoped that the new Cabinet will be able to implement sweeping structural reform, overcome the difficulties faced by the nation in terms of its efforts to participate in international economic integration and bring change and reform to the national economy.
Tung Chen-yuan is a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known affectionately as “Big S,” recently passed away from pneumonia caused by the flu. The Mandarin word for the flu — which translates to “epidemic cold” in English — is misleading. Although the flu tends to spread rapidly and shares similar symptoms with the common cold, its name easily leads people to underestimate its dangers and delay seeking medical treatment. The flu is an acute viral respiratory illness, and there are vaccines to prevent its spread and strengthen immunity. This being the case, the Mandarin word for “influenza” used in Taiwan should be renamed from the misleading