US and China in cahoots?
As an American, it was disheartening to experience the events leading up to Taiwan’s recent presidential elections, as described by Chen Ching-chih (陳清志) (“US intervened in Jan. 14 election,” Jan. 30, page 8), despite American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Chairman Raymond Bughardt’s insistence that the US remained neutral during the election campaign (“AIT chair repeats US ‘neutrality’ in presidential poll,” Jan. 31, page 1).
It defies imagination that any reasonable person without a political axe to grind would come to any different conclusion than that expressed by Chen. The obvious question this raises to me is why the US so blatantly attempted to influence the outcome of the election.
As an avid follower of international news, a number of international events leading up to the election and immediately afterward raised a stunning question in my mind.
Here are my observations:
It is common knowledge that the US has been trying to get international support from countries to not purchase oil from Iran in order to reduce their oil revenues and pressure the country to negotiate a settlement to end their pursuit of nuclear technology. China, which imports about 11 percent of its oil supplies from Iran, has been a major target of US diplomacy on this matter.
On Jan. 10, US Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner visited Beijing, in part to discuss China’s participation in the international boycott of Iranian oil.
On Jan. 15, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) started his visit to oil-producing countries in the Middle East with an initial visit to Saudi Arabia.
Can we connect the dots? Was there a quid pro quo agreement between the US and China? Did the US agree to “indirectly” intervene in the Taiwanese presidential election to ensure Ma’s victory, on the condition that China would make efforts to replace its Iranian oil supply with oil from other Middle Eastern countries?
Taiwan’s presidential election was held on Jan. 14, one day before Wen began his tour of oil-producing Middle Eastern countries. It was his first visit to Saudi Arabia in 20 years.
Sam Ritchie
Taipei
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously