There was some good news for environmentalists, preservationists and Aborigines this week — not from the central government, but from the Pingtung County Government — which stood up for common sense and a sense of history, and against ill-planned development for development’s sake. Let’s hope the central government takes note and follows suit.
A county review committee has designated 841.3 hectares of public land as a nature reserve to preserve the Alangyi Trail, a 12km-long coastline trail that had been threatened by the planned construction of a section of Provincial Highway No. 26 that would have run alongside the trail, destroying the pristine nature of the area and threatening the hundreds of species of flora and fauna that find a home there, including the endangered green sea turtle.
The trail was established in the 1870s by Aborigines, who used it to travel along the Pacific coast between what is now Hengchun (恆春) in Pingtung County and Taitung County.
Last July, the Pingtung County Government designated the area around the portion of the trail under its jurisdiction a temporary nature reserve. Now that designation has been made permanent — under the guidelines of the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act (文化資產保留法). It covers the area from Syuhai Village (旭海) in Pingtung to Nantian Village (南田).
It has been a long battle to save the last 1 percent of natural coastline in the nation, going back almost a decade, since the highway construction project passed an environmental impact assessment in 2002. You have to wonder if any of the people on the assessment committee had ever been down to the trail, to see what they were willing to sign away.
The eastern coastline is one of Taiwan’s most beautiful features; it is also the most frequently lashed by typhoons. The result is, unfortunately, that if you drive along the coast, much of what you can see is now “protected” by concrete tetrapods and other barriers.
In a bid to entice more tourists to the east coast, several developments along the coast of Hualien County and Taitung are either underway or in the planning process, including the much-derided and condemned Meiliwan Resort Hotel at Shanyuan Bay and other recreational parks and hotels. So not only will there be a long link of concrete structures along the coastline, concrete will cover much of the land as well. Paving over natural scenery and resources is not the way to attract tourists.
All too often these development projects have been dropped on local communities in the name of national development, with little regard to their feelings and wants. Complaints are brushed aside with the excuse that approval of such development projects has been made in accordance with the law.
However, adherence to the law, especially the Administrative Procedure Act (行政程序法) and the Indigenous Peoples Basic Act (原住民族基本法), appears be cursory at best, even though developers always complain of excessive red tape. The required public hearings are not held, or held after a decision to proceed has already been made, while the need for the consent and participation of local Aboriginal residents is treated with perfunctory disdain.
Last year, environmentalists and other activists scored a victory when the Kuokuang Petrochemcial Technology Co project in a wetland area of Changhua County on the west coast was scrapped in April because of concerns over water consumption, land subsidence and pollution in such an ecologically sensitive area. That too was a victory of common sense over over-development.
Just as there were complaints about the Kuokuang outcome, there are some who still want to see a road built next to the trail and who will lobby for a reversal of the Pingtung County Government’s decision.
However, these two decisions in favor of the environment are the start of a new mindset in Taiwan.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS