On Monday last week, there was an interesting debate on interactions between Taiwan and the WHO in the pages of the Liberty Times (the sister publication of the Taipei Times) and on CNA News, between a Taiwanese health professional and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
In his article, Peter Chang (張武修), a former advisor on international affairs to the Ministry of Health and former health attache in Geneva and Brussels, underlined the lack of action on the part of Taiwan’s government in protesting the WHO’s use of the name “Taiwan, province of China” as outlined in an internal document.
He also complained about the government’s ineffectiveness in securing opportunities for Taiwan’s medical community to participate in WHO events and technical meetings.
In response to these accusations, the ministry published a short article detailing its protests against the degradation of Taiwan’s sovereignty and the WHO events in which Taiwanese delegates have participated.
What was of particular interest in this exchange between a health professional and diplomat and government officials was the needs and concerns that it revealed.
The debate shed light on the urgent need for more information and transparency about the space offered to Taiwan by the WHO since it became a World Health Assembly (WHA) observer in May 2009. The question about the real level of participation by Taiwan in WHO events and meetings and concerns that such observership is just a seven-day ticket to the WHA are legitimate areas of public interest.
This should alert the government to the fact that it needs to share more information about Taiwan’s participation in WHO events and to detail what, if anything, concrete has been achieved by such participation.
Beyond the quantitative aspect of participation, there is also a qualitative element. This reaction also reveals the need for a better understanding of the benefits that the participation of Taiwanese delegates at WHO meetings provides in terms of helping to improve Taiwanese and global health. Have Taiwan’s delegates to these meetings proposed initiatives, exchanged ideas openly and tried to influence the debates?
If that is the case, then the government should be sharing this information with its citizens as well as the international community. It might be impossible to talk about work in progress for the next WHO meeting, but once Taiwan has participated in a WHO event, information should be shared.
This approach would help to avoid skepticism about Taiwan’s participation in the organization’s events.
In addition, the exchange also highlighted concerns about Taiwan’s sovereignty and once again a need for more transparency about the government’s efforts to protect it when working with the WHO or participating in its events. Progress on this issue, which is central in Taiwan’s politics, should be shared with Taiwanese on a frequent basis.
Moreover, the role of the memorandum of understanding signed between China and the WHO in 2005, which gave Beijing the right to control interactions between Taiwan and the international organization and thereby downgraded Taiwan’s sovereignty, need to be publicly clarified.
Once again, if efforts have been made to protect Taiwan’s sovereignty while participating in WHO meetings, Taiwan should be proud of that and not be shy about sharing it. This would undoubtedly reduce criticism of the government and ultimately facilitate even greater support from civil society.
Vincent Rollet is an advisor to the Taiwan Health National Contact Point of the EU Framework Program on Research and Innovation.
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
RSS