Writing on the acquisition of personality traits, psychoanalyst Erik Erikson identified hope as the first stage of human psycho-social development, contingent on whether the infant has basic “trust” or “mistrust” in its caregiver. A favorable outcome is the development of the psycho-social “virtues” of inner contentment and optimism, and the potential to trust both oneself and others. In other words, this is the development of a sense of hope. For Erikson, the opposite of hope is a lack of trust.
During the first presidential debate on Dec. 3, all three candidates pledged to bring a renewed sense of hope to Taiwan. The public’s current lack of trust in organizations — from economic to judicial and cultural, from cross-strait relations to politics — needs to be addressed. Hope can only exist when this trust has been rebuilt.
However, it will take more than talk to do so. When people are low, hard facts are not going to lift their spirits. Neither is it sufficient to encourage sacrifice to ensure future success. Studies in positive psychology suggest that happiness is an important factor. Happy people tend to be more positive and optimistic, and these feelings go a long way to producing success, arming people with the wisdom and resolve to overcome the challenges before them.
Research also shows a positive correlation between how happy the president of a company is and how pleasant employees find the work environment, which therefore impacts the quality and quantity of their output. It is not good enough for our leaders, with their mutual mistrust and hostility, to promise hope on the horizon, but neglect to create the right conditions for it. Making such assurances is like putting a wonderful menu in front of a starving man too weak to survive until the food arrives. If you offer promises you cannot immediately fulfill, you will only rub salt into the wound.
There are two meanings of the word “hope” in psychology, depending on whether it is a noun or a verb. The former refers to a desirable future construct, with the passive individual consigned to uncertainty in the present. The latter refers to the ability of an individual to envisage a positive future. In this way, the individual is able to construct itself psychologically, morally and in relation to others, and therefore to plan ahead. Transforming the idea of hope from the noun form to the verb has a multiplier effect on happiness.
There has been much talk of the fact that many people cannot perceive the effects of economic recovery, and I think the public mood and people’s need to retreat from perceived threats can largely account for this. When people are faced with difficult situations, the way they experience what is happening in their lives is colored by their mood and they retreat to a place far divorced from one in which they will be able to hope.
Emotions are complex. It is easy to talk of sadness, happiness or regret in reference to some “moral economy” of hope, but these are just convenient generalizations. This is why it is so hard for the public to buy into the optimistic atmosphere President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is trying to conjure up with his slogan: “Things will get better soon with Ma.” The public knows this as political posturing, and mistrusts it.
Elevating hope as some higher ideal is a romantic indulgence that risks consigning marginalized members of society further into confusion, chaos and silence.
In The Count of Monte Cristo, Alexandre Dumas has the count say that all human wisdom can be summed up in two words: “wait” and “hope.” Hope is both a social attribute and a form of power distribution and it will never become a reality for all until we can achieve trust in society.
Lin Yaw-sheng is a professor of psychology at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recent global media coverage of Taiwan has at times reduced the nation’s success in containing the spread of COVID-19 to some East Asian values such as cooperation with social control or Confucianism. An article in Wired magazine debunks this myth, crediting the nation’s success to democracy and transparency. It is appalling to learn that this misconception still exists. Here is one thing that world citizens should keep in mind: Taiwan is the first and only country in Asia that has legalized same-sex marriage. There is nothing Confucian about that. If anything, the Confucian legacy is a major obstacle that Taiwanese
The novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 — or the Wuhan virus, after the Chinese city from which it emerged — could not have come at a more advantageous time for China’s communist government. Not for the Chinese people, of course, thousands of whom have perished because of Beijing’s lack of transparency, disinformation and cruel refusal to cooperate with international public health organizations. No, the advantage goes exclusively to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), whose deceptive practices unleashed the deadly virus to the world. To understand how Beijing benefits from the pandemic, it is necessary
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), tasked with reforming the party and returning it to the viable political force that it once was, is faced with a Gordian knot. The complexities of the job ahead go beyond appealing to a younger generation of voters. Chiang might have to decide between jettisoning much of what the party originally stood for and preparing it for a return to the Presidential Office, or doubling down on its founding purpose and representing what is increasingly, in the current state of Taiwanese politics, a minority view. The KMT, as the founding party and self-proclaimed champion
Although concerned over the impact of many citizens returning from Europe and the US while those nations cope with soaring COVID-19 infection rates, Taiwan has handled the pandemic with alacrity and seems to be successfully managing the process compared with many others, including European nations and the US. Despite its proximity to China, by March 3, Taiwan had only 42 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and one death, while Japan had 287 cases and six deaths and South Korea had 4,812 cases and 28 deaths. This is of considerable interest internationally because Taiwan is not only located near China, but is relatively densely