According to the UN’s Population Division, the world’s population hit 7 billion on Oct. 31. As always happens whenever we approach such a milestone, this one has produced a spike in conferences, seminars and learned articles, including the usual dire Malthusian predictions. After all, the UN forecasts that the world population will rise to 9.3 billion in 2050 and surpass 10 billion by the end of this century.
However, such forecasts misrepresent underlying demographic dynamics. The future we face is not one of too much population growth, but too little.
Most countries conducted their national population census last year and the data suggests that fertility rates are plunging in most of them. Birth rates have been low in developed countries for some time, but now they are falling rapidly in the majority of developing countries.
Chinese, Russians and Brazilians are no longer replacing themselves, while Indians are having far fewer children. Indeed, global fertility will fall to the replacement rate in a little more than a decade. Population might keep growing until mid-century, owing to rising longevity, but reproductively speaking, our species should no longer be expanding.
What demographers call the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) is the average number of live births per woman over her lifetime. In the long run, a population is said to be stable if the TFR is at the replacement rate, which is a little above 2.3 for the world as a whole and somewhat lower, at 2.1, for developed countries, reflecting their lower infant--mortality rates.
The TFR for most developed countries now stands well below replacement levels. The Organisation for Economic Co--operation and Development average is at about 1.74, but some countries, including Germany and Japan, produce less than 1.4 children per woman. -However, the biggest TFR declines in recent years have been in developing countries. The TFR in China and India was 6.1 and 5.9 respectively in 1950. It now stands at 1.8 in China, owing to the authorities’ aggressive one-child policy, while rapid urbanization and changing social attitudes have brought down India’s TFR to 2.6.
An additional factor could depress future birth rates in China and India. The Chinese census suggests that there are 118.6 boys being born for every 100 girls. Similarly, India has a gender ratio at birth of about 110 boys for every 100 girls, with large regional variations. Compare this with the natural ratio of 105 boys per 100 girls.
The deviation is usually attributed to a cultural preference for boys, which will take an additional toll on both populations, as the future scarcity of women implies that both countries’ effective reproductive capacity is below what is suggested by the unadjusted TFR.
Indeed, after adjusting for the gender imbalance, China’s Effective Fertility Rate (EFR) is about 1.5 and India’s is 2.45. In other words, the Chinese are very far from replacing themselves and the Indians are only slightly above the replacement rate.
The EFR stands at about 2.4 for the world as a whole, barely above the replacement rate. Current trends suggest that the human race will no longer be replacing itself by the early 2020s. Population growth after this will be mostly caused by people living longer, a factor that will diminish in significance from mid-century.
These shifts have important implications for the global labor supply. China is aging very rapidly and its working-age population will begin to shrink within a few years. Relaxing the one-child policy might have some positive impact in the very long run, but China is already past the tipping point, pushed there by the combined effect of gender imbalance and a very skewed age structure.
The number of women of child-bearing age (15 to 49 years) in China will drop 8 percent between last year and 2020, another 10 percent in the 2020s and, if not corrected, at an even faster pace thereafter. Therefore, China will have to withdraw an increasing proportion of its female workforce and deploy it for reproduction and childcare. Even if China can engineer this, it implies an immediate outflow from the workforce, with the benefits lagging by 25 years.
Meanwhile, the labor force has peaked or is close to peaking in most major economies. Germany, Japan and Russia already have declining workforces. The US is one of a handful of advanced countries with a growing workforce, owing to its relative openness to immigration, but this may change as the source countries become richer and undergo rapid declines in birth rates. Therefore, many developed countries will have to consider how to keep people working productively well into their 70s.
India, the only large economy whose workforce will grow in sufficient scale over the next three decades, could partly balance the declines expected in other major economies, but with birth rates declining there too, current trends suggest that its population will probably stabilize at 1.55 billion in the early 2050s, a full decade ahead of — and 170 million people below — the UN’s forecast.
Given this, it is likely that the world population will peak at 9 billion in the 2050s, a half-century sooner than generally anticipated, followed by a sharp decline. One could argue that this is a good thing, in view of the planet’s limited carrying capacity, but when demographic dynamics turn, the world will have to confront a different set of problems.
Sanjeev Sanyal is global strategist at Deutsche Bank.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
China has successfully held its Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, with 53 of 55 countries from the African Union (AU) participating. The two countries that did not participate were Eswatini and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which have no diplomatic relations with China. Twenty-four leaders were reported to have participated. Despite African countries complaining about summit fatigue, with recent summits held with Russia, Italy, South Korea, the US and Indonesia, as well as Japan next month, they still turned up in large numbers in Beijing. China’s ability to attract most of the African leaders to a summit demonstrates that it is still being
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips
RSS