US President Barack Obama’s administration announced on Sept. 21 that it would upgrade Taiwan’s F-16A/Bs instead of selling it F-16C/Ds. This decision set off heated exchanges between Taiwan’s ruling and opposition parties. The Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the upgrades “would prove to be even better than the F-16C/D jets.” The opposition party accused the ruling party of blowing its own trumpet and said its logic was flawed.
US arms sales to Taiwan touch on the sensitive issue of relations between Taiwan, the US and China, and media outlets around the world always pay close attention. However, Washington’s promise to provide Taiwan with adequate military equipment, as stated in the Taiwan Relations Act, to deter a Chinese attack has increasingly come into question, with a number of US academics and politicians suggesting that the US should abandon Taiwan. George Washington University professor Charles Glaser expressed such views in his article entitled “Will China’s Rise Lead to War?” in the March/April edition of Foreign Affairs. Views like this mean the latest arms deal has gained particular attention.
The Sept. 24 issue of The Economist featured an article entitled “Dim sum for China: Why America should not walk away from Taiwan,” which said there were two main arguments used to justify US desertion of Taiwan. First, under President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) cross-strait relations are better than in the past. According to this view, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is more nationalistic than the KMT, and there are worries that if Taiwan declares independence, the US “risks being dragged into conflict, even nuclear war.”
Second, even without war, Taiwan would still be an obstacle to better Sino-US relations. Giving China what it wants — such as Taiwan — could be exchanged for Sino-US cooperation “on a host of issues ranging from nuclear proliferation to climate change.”
Rebutting the first argument, the article said that DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) “is a lot more moderate than Mr Chen [former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁)].” In addition, it said that while the younger DPP politicians may be nationalistic, they are also pragmatic and understand that continued US support is crucial.
The article said that if the US abandoned Taiwan, it would essentially be conceding to China’s intentions to annex Taiwan and that this would not be beneficial to improving US-China relations. It said that a look at China’s diplomatic history shows that it only respects powerful nations. Furthermore, “appeasement would also probably increase China’s appetite for regional domination” since its “core interests” in the area are growing continuously, it said. This could “lead the region’s democracies to worry that America might be willing to let them swing too,” it said, adding “that is why, as long as China insists on the right to use force in Taiwan, America should continue to support the island.”
A capable government focuses on economic development when it knows it has guaranteed the nation’s security; it does not blindly pursue economic benefit at the risk of undermining the nation. Taiwan’s national defense should be based on a “Taiwan consensus” that includes both the governing and the opposition camps. The failure to obtain F-16C/Ds is a setback, further widening the gap in military power between China and Taiwan. Hopefully, the government would stick to its promise to continue pushing the US to sell F-16C/Ds and submarines. Otherwise, with China continuing to threaten Taiwan militarily and blocking its arms purchase, Taiwan can only wait to be pushed around.
Liu Shun-ming has a master’s degree in public policy and management from Carnegie Mellon University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US