In her small fashion boutique in a village near Saint-Etienne, Valerie Dongrazi is feeling the pressure of French banking jitters and the economic rut.
The 44-year-old store owner has not paid herself a salary for more than a year. When she did, it was 1,300 euros (US$1,730) a month. She has had to start buying cheaper foreign stock, as clients in her village in southeastern France who once paid 270 euros for a good winter coat, can now afford just 150 euros. To stay on top of overheads, she relies on going to her bank to increase costly overdrafts or ask for loans.
However, with a big question mark over French banks’ stability, shares in the biggest banks plummeting and talk of a state bailout, the lifeline of bank credit to businesses like Dongrazi’s is drying up. French banks are nervous about lending money, companies are struggling and consumer confidence has fallen to the lowest level since February 2009, when France was suffering its worst recession since World War II.
“There’s a mood of fear; people are not buying for pleasure, barely for necessity. I’m not optimistic,” she said.
Rumors about the fragility of French banks and their ability to cope with losses from Greek debt has thrown a spotlight on the wider woes of the economy and its slippery hold on its “AAA” rating. The shares of France’s biggest banks have lost half of their value in just three months. In any other country, this might signal panic on the streets, but France believes it is battling bigger economic problems: spiralling public debt, stagnant growth, low business morale and high unemployment.
PROTECTED
French banks continue to insist they do not need a state bailout and can withstand losses. Although big international firms have begun moving funds out of Paris banks, households are not rushing to withdraw savings.
A bank run similar to the one that British bank Northern Rock suffered in 2007 would be unlikely in France, where savings have high state protection. As one economist said, there is a notion that the state will “always step in” as protector. There is little chance of a major French bank going under because it has been made clear that the government could, within minutes, take the decision to recapitalize.
However, the banking wobble has highlighted serious wider problems in the sluggish economy. Just as the omnipresent state offers a safety net for the banks, business lobbies say its suffocating grip on the country’s financial workings are more of a problem than ever. France did not fall quite as low as Britain or Ireland in 2008, but — famous for red tape, regulation and high labor costs — it is still struggling to bounce back. The eurozone’s second---biggest economy failed to grow at all in the second quarter as consumer spending nosedived.
“I think the seriousness of the banks’ situation was exaggerated,” said Marc Touati, economist at Paris-based Assya. “The real problem is growth. Unfortunately, a recession is approaching.”
He sees the risk of a slowdown that could last into next year. With no growth, there would be higher unemployment and more public debt. Failure to rein in France’s public deficit —one of Europe’s highest — could threaten credibility abroad and social cohesion at home.
“In France, even more than elsewhere, all this depends too much on politics and political decisions,” he added.
HOLES TO FILL
With seven months until a presidential election, the role of politicians is crucial. The priority is to plug the hole in state coffers created by decades of the state living beyond its means. France has a vast social security deficit, as well as big holes in local authority and central government finances. The country has not balanced a budget since 1974.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy has published belt--tightening budget proposals for next year: to raise taxes. The government wants to stick to its target to cut the deficit to 3 percent of GDP in 2013, but though it has cut its growth predictions to 1.75 percent for this year and next, economists fear growth will not be strong enough to generate the tax revenues the government is counting on.
“What’s the economic strategy for the next decade? I don’t think anyone has a clue,” said Alexander Law, chief economist at Xerfi. “There is an idea France will have to start copying Germany, be slightly less generous to households and more accommodating fiscally to companies. That hasn’t seeped through into the political echelons; the 2012 budget is taxing everyone a bit more.”
“Tax will move from companies towards consumers — people know that’s going to happen, but they don’t know when and how, or how unpopular it’s going to be — ranging from very unpopular to horrendously unpopular,” he said.
Jean-Guilhem Darre, of the SDI union for businesses with fewer than 20 staff, said the next six months would be hard: “We’re not yet in the same state as in 2008, but we see the elements returning to have the same type of crisis as 2008.”
Pierre Coinaud, who represents business leaders in the central Limousin region, blames the overweening state.
“State rules and regulations are so rigid it’s difficult for firms to react quickly or adapt to economic realities,” he said.
“France’s problem is that we don’t export enough, we live in an internal market, kept afloat and helped along by the state,” he said. “Now the state needs to tighten its belt and that will have an effect on the market. French businesses need more freedom, more air to breathe.”
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which