The New School for Democracy, which will attempt to reach into Chinese-speaking societies and overseas Chinese communities, officially opened on Saturday and welcomed everyone who hopes for democratic politics and is interested in learning about the culture of democracy.
To some extent, the founding of the New School for Democracy was influenced by the “Jasmine Revolution” that sprung out of nowhere at the start of this year in North Africa and the Middle East. This revolution, which began in Tunisia, shook the Islamic world and formerly stable authoritarian governments, with even former Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi being forced to flee.
Perhaps even more interesting is the case of Singapore, which has consistently advocated “Asian Values” and adhered to what critics call “enlightened despotism” based on traditional ethical values.
The results of a general election there this year forced former Singaporean prime minister Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀) to hastily resign from his position as minister mentor, as a way of reducing some of the pressure on the governing People’s Action Party.
The Jasmine Revolution also sent authorities in Beijing into a state of panic, forcing them to resort to heavy-handed tactics to suppress news from being spread over the Internet about where protests were going to be held.
The global spread of the Jasmine Revolution has been a powerful indicator and symbol of the universal nature of freedom and democracy and the widespread acceptance these values have gained.
On seeing this, a few individuals who have long been concerned about democracy in China decided to establish the New School for Democracy, announcing its formation just before the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre in June. The objective continues to be the dissemination of democratic ideals and the hope that these will take root in China.
We now understand that only by keeping the flame of democracy alive and working to spread the seeds of democracy can we hope to encourage more people to embrace the need for democracy in Chinese societies, while putting the universal values of freedom, democracy and human rights into practice.
Judging from the intensity of the presidential and legislative election campaigns in Taiwan, it is clear that democracy must also be backed up by a mature civil society lest it disintegrate into a war of words and mudslinging, which can make it impossible for democracy to win the trust of the public.
It is for this reason that academics, members of social movements and the media need to come up with answers to the questions that will inevitably arise when they take part in courses and recruit students for the New School for Democracy.
They should also work to improve the quality of Taiwanese democracy, strengthen nongovernmental monitoring of politicians and reflect on practical experiences, while devising ways to bridge the gap that currently exists between Chinese culture and democracy.
Such an approach should be helpful in the long-term operation of a democratic system.
Ku Chung-hwa is director of the New School for Democracy.
Translated by Drew Cameron
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS