As of June, China had set up 25 “Taiwanese farmers’ enterprise parks” in 12 of its provinces and municipalities. The Legislative Yuan’s Budget Center says that this trend is now causing grave worries about an outflow of agricultural talent and technology from Taiwan, and it says that the likelihood of Chinese farm produce being sold back to Taiwan has greatly increased.
In fact, many techniques associated with farm produce varieties on which Taiwan prides itself, such as orchids, golden diamond pineapples and golden mangoes, have already leaked out.
In the case of oolong tea, the varieties themselves, along with the full set of associated manufacturing techniques, have been completely transplanted to China. The consequences of such actions are more far--reaching than tea being sold back to Taiwan. Export competition from China has greatly increased and China has taken over Taiwan’s position in the world market.
In 1992, Taiwan and China accounted for equal portions of Japan’s imports of agricultural products at about 7 percent each, but by 2009 China’s share had risen to 12.44 percent, while Taiwan’s fell to just 1.18 percent.
Unfortunately, these “Taiwanese farmers’ enterprise parks” stem from a communique, signed by Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) General--Secretary Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) on April 29, 2005, calling for “carrying out agricultural and fishery cooperation [and] resolving the problem of selling Taiwanese agricultural products on the mainland.”
At the annual Boao Forum for Asia conference on Oct. 17 of the same year, the KMT and CCP went a step further by holding a forum on cross-strait agricultural cooperation, at which they arrived at the following common understandings. First, to complete the construction of agricultural cooperative experimental zones and Taiwanese farmers’ enterprise parks. Second, to encourage and support agricultural cooperation and disseminate know-how, and to broaden the scope of cooperation. Third, to facilitate trade in agricultural products and sales of products made by Taiwan-invested agricultural enterprises in China. Fourth, to protect Taiwanese agricultural products and intellectual property rights, so as to uphold the legitimate rights of Taiwanese farmers.
A careful look at these four points clearly reveals the strategy of the KMT and CCP, which was to send Taiwanese technical talent and capital to China, while Beijing compensates Taiwanese farmers by buying more agricultural products in exchange. In other words, the expectation that Taiwan would swap its golden-egg-laying hen for plain old chicken’s eggs from China.
The KMT would like people to think that it is trying to give poor, hard-working Taiwanese farmers a “second springtime.” In reality, however, this trend, headed as it is by a number of retired Council of Agriculture officials, has only brought a “second springtime” to a few rich farmers, farmers’ association officers, merchants, former council officials and agricultural experts. These people have headed off to China one after another to invest or work as advisers. They have replicated Taiwan’s agricultural experience, adopted its excellent varieties and applied its advanced techniques and business management models in China.
The Budget Center warns that, as the cross-strait gap in agricultural technology narrows, Taiwanese agriculture will be displaced and could even be wiped out. Considering the policies the KMT agreed upon with the CCP, farming in Taiwan is sure to continue along this path to destruction if the party stays in power.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
RSS