Infuriated that Washington met secretly at least three times with a personal emissary of Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar, the Afghan government intentionally leaked details of the clandestine meetings, scuttling the talks and sending the Taliban intermediary into hiding, The Associated Press (AP) has learned.
In a series of interviews with diplomats, current and former Taliban members, Afghan government officials and a close childhood friend of the intermediary, Tayyab Aga, the AP learned Aga is hiding in Europe and is afraid to return to Pakistan because of fears of reprisals. The US has had no direct contact with him for months.
A senior US official acknowledged that the talks imploded because of the leak and that Aga, while alive, had disappeared. The US will continue to pursue talks, the official said. Current and former US officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the talks.
Illustration: mountain people
The US acknowledged the talks after Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who apparently fears being sidelined by US-Taliban talks, confirmed published accounts about them in June, but has never publicly detailed the content, format or participants. The first was held late last year followed by at least two other meetings in early spring of this year, the former US official said. The sessions were held in Germany and Qatar, he said.
A childhood friend of Aga’s, who spoke on condition he not be identified because he feared retaliation, said Aga was in Germany. A diplomat in the region said Aga fled to a European country after his contacts with the US were revealed.
Collapse of the direct talks between Aga and US officials probably spoiled the best chance yet at reaching Omar, considered the linchpin to ending the Taliban fight against the US-backed government in Afghanistan. The contacts were preliminary, but had begun to bear fruit, Afghan and US officials said.
Perhaps most importantly, they offered the tantalizing prospect of a brokered agreement between the US and the Taliban — one that would allow the larger reconciliation of the Taliban into Afghanistan political life to move forward. The US has not committed to any such deal, but the Taliban wants security assurances from the US.
The talks were deliberately revealed by someone within the presidential palace, where Karzai’s office is located, said a Western and an Afghan official. The reason for the leak was Karzai’s animosity toward the US and fear that any agreement Washington brokered would undermine his authority, they said.
The AP sought comment from Karzai’s office, but was referred to palace press department spokesman Hamid Elmi, who did not answer his phone during repeated calls.
Pakistan had also been kept in the dark about the talks, people knowledgeable about them said. An Afghan official with contacts with the Taliban said the insurgents decided not to tell Pakistan about the meetings with the US.
At the time of the leak, Washington had already offered small concessions that the US intended as “confidence-building measures,” a former senior US official said. They were aimed at developing a rapport and moving talks forward, said a current US official on condition he not be identified because of the sensitivity of the topic.
The concessions included treating the Taliban and al-Qaeda differently under international sanctions. The Taliban argued that while al-Qaeda is focused on worldwide jihad against the West, Taliban militants have focused on Afghanistan and have shown little interest in attacking targets abroad.
Other goodwill gestures that were not made public included Aga’s safe passage to Germany, US officials said. The US also offered assurances that it would not block the Taliban from opening an office in a third country, the official said.
Aga slowly established his bona fides with the US officials, who had initial doubts both about his identity and his level of contact and influence with Omar, a former and current US official with knowledge of the discussion said. For example, a coded reference to the talks appeared on a Taliban-affiliated Web site following one meeting, just as Aga said it would, one official said.
The whereabouts and eventual release of US Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl of Hailey, Idaho, who was captured more than two years ago in eastern Afghanistan, featured prominently in the talks, according to Aga’s childhood friend and a senior Western diplomat in the region. The US negotiators asked Aga what could be done to gain Bergdahl’s release.
Aga sought the freedom of Taliban fighters in US custody in Guantanamo Bay and Bagram Air Field, north of the Afghan capital, where an estimated 600 Afghans are being held. Still at Guantanamo Bay is former Taliban Defense Ministry chief of staff Mullah Mohammed Fazil, Taliban intelligence official Abdul Haq Wasiq and former Herat governor Mullah Khairullah Khairkhwa. Afghanistan’s High Peace Council tasked by Karzai with the job of finding a negotiated settlement with insurgents has requested Khairkhwa’s release.
A former US official familiar with the talks said the loss of the Aga contact dismayed and angered the US side, and further eroded thin trust in Karzai. There is a difference of opinion among US diplomats, military officials and others about how directly Karzai should be blamed, but several officials agreed that the leak was an attempt to torpedo a diplomatic channel that Karzai and his inner circle worried would sideline and undercut the Afghan leader.
As the Afghan war slides into its 10th year and Washington plans to withdraw its combat forces by the end of 2014, a negotiated settlement between the Karzai government and the Taliban has become a stated goal for the US. It is the centerpiece of efforts by Marc Grossman, the US special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Karzai has launched a separate peace outreach, with the High Peace Council representing numerous political factions.
A member of that High Peace Council, who asked not to be identified by name so he could talk candidly, said that the leaking of the talks reveals the level of mistrust and the lack of coordination among the key players in any eventual peace deal.
He said all the key players — the US, the Afghan government, the Afghan National Security Council and the High Peace Council — are holding separate and secret talks with their own contacts within the insurgency.
The US, for example, has also held secret talks with Ibrahim Haqqani, the brother of Jalaluddin Haqqani, who heads the notorious Haqqani network considered by US and NATO troops in Afghanistan to be their biggest threat. That contact was confirmed by officials from Pakistan, Afghanistan and the US.
Karzai met with representatives of wanted rebel leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who is seeking greater involvement at the peace table and direct talks with the US, said diplomats in the region.
The flurry of meetings the US is holding with the various factions in the Afghan conflict has also extended to Pakistan, where the most powerful insurgents have found safe havens.
A month ago, US Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Senator John Kerry and Pakistan’s army chief of staff General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani met for a marathon eight hours in a Gulf country. Peace negotiations with Afghanistan’s insurgents featured prominently, said both Pakistani and US officials who would not be identified by name because of the secret nature of the meeting.
A US official familiar with the talks said Kayani made a pitch during his marathon meeting with Kerry that Pakistan take on a far larger role in Afghanistan peacemaking. The US considers Pakistan an essential part of an eventual deal, but neither the US nor Pakistan trusts the other’s motives in Afghanistan.
Meanwhile, an unexpected consequence of attempts to find peace with the Taliban has been the rearming of the so-called Northern Alliance, that represents Afghanistan’s ethnic minorities and who were partnered with the coalition at the outset of Operation Enduring Freedom to topple the Taliban regime.
For the warlords that make up the Northern Alliance, Martine van Bijlert, co-director and co-founder of the Afghan Analyst Network in the capital, Kabul, talk of peace threatens their survival.
Warlords-cum-government ministers and vice presidents are watching attempts at finding a peaceful end to the war with trepidation, each wondering: “What if it unravels, who is going to come after me? Will I be the weakest in the room? They are feeling very vulnerable.”
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
Navy Commander Admiral Tang Hua (唐華) said in an interview with The Economist that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has been implementing an “anaconda strategy” to subdue Taiwan since President William Lai (賴清德) assumed office. The Chinese military is “slowly, but surely” increasing its presence around Taiwan proper, it quoted Tang as saying. “They are ready to blockade Taiwan at any time they want,” he said. “They give you extreme pressure, pressure, pressure. They’re trying to exhaust you.” Beijing’s goal is to “force Taiwan to make mistakes,” Tang said, adding that they could be “excuses” for a blockade. The interview reminds me
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence