Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has put the party’s 10-year policy guidelines at the center of her presidential campaign. Tsai is Taiwan’s first female presidential candidate and one expects the platform to reflect a woman’s perspective on the issues it seeks to address.
This is not to say that the female and the male approaches are entirely mutually exclusive or that the two stand in opposition to one another. Rather, it is to say that a woman can bring a fresh perspective to the discourse, with a woman’s concerns, experience and standpoint, and a willingness to put these into practice. For example, a female politician can approach the prevailing male monopoly on a range of issues that touch upon matters of state-to-state war and peace — from national security, national defense and military affairs, to diplomacy and national sovereignty — from a more emotionally engaged, more altruistic and softer stance than her male counterparts.
In addition, female politicians tend to be more concerned with matters above and beyond the aforementioned so-called high-level political issues, extending their focus to include lower-level political matters, such as economic development, social movements and environmental protection.
In particular, the mainstream discourse on national development, seen from the perhaps typically male perspective of economic rationalism, tends to ignore women’s activity in the private sphere — including unpaid labor, such as bringing up a family and taking care of the home — and the contributions such activity makes to society as a whole. Furthermore, in terms of the economic division of labor under globalization, capitalists have come to rely on cheap female labor as their preferred strategy to drive costs down, often disregarding the working conditions and workplace safety of female workers.
Female politicians are more likely to be sensitive to such issues and indeed have a duty and a responsibility to address them.
Taiwan’s female politicians might also be able to approach two major issues from a wider perspective: There is the cross-strait issue and the deconstruction of the myth of the centrality of the state, breaking down the distinctions between international and domestic, the public and private spheres, and the state and the market. The public needs to be made aware that there are more solutions to the cross-strait issue than the purely pragmatic and that this approach can be replaced by ideals such as social justice, human rights and humanistic concerns, using a bottom-up rather than top-down approach.
There is also the question of how to approach the inherent tensions between globalization and localization, initially with an exploration of the underlying social inequalities — of gender, class and ethnicity — behind economic growth and how those inequalities can be addressed within the context of the globalized market to ensure that the economic benefits are more fairly distributed.
In terms of globalization, a woman’s perspective can bring back an identification with the local, a return to local values, promoting the implementation of globalized ideas in local areas to reinvigorate local economies, protect local ecologies and ensure sustainable development.
Whether seeking a fresh definition of cross-strait relations or a new way to approach globalization, we have great expectations of the potential of Taiwan’s first female presidential candidate.
Lee Cheng-hung is a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Political Science at National Sun Yat-sen University. Yu Chia-che is an assistant professor at Cheng Shiu University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known affectionately as “Big S,” recently passed away from pneumonia caused by the flu. The Mandarin word for the flu — which translates to “epidemic cold” in English — is misleading. Although the flu tends to spread rapidly and shares similar symptoms with the common cold, its name easily leads people to underestimate its dangers and delay seeking medical treatment. The flu is an acute viral respiratory illness, and there are vaccines to prevent its spread and strengthen immunity. This being the case, the Mandarin word for “influenza” used in Taiwan should be renamed from the misleading