An article in Foreign Policy recently included Taiwan in a list of countries whose legislatures don’t work. The People First Party (PFP) is now officially entering the legislative elections and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) has announced that he wants to start a second “Quiet Revolution” that would reform the government and the legislature.
Whether or not this happens will be decided by voters. However, regardless of what does happen, the only thing left for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the PFP is to battle it out. Soong has burned all his bridges and as he as nothing to lose, it is only a matter of time before he runs for president. Although the cleft between the two parties is still not a firm split, their mixture of talks and attacks won’t last long.
The adoption of a single-member district, double ballot system in the 2008 legislative elections was a watershed in Taiwanese party politics. Experts criticized the system, saying it meant that the winner would take all, making it difficult for smaller parties to survive. However, it could also give smaller parties more opportunities and more clout to attack the bigger parties.
In other words, small parties would be able to create problems for big ones, so it would all depend on whether the big parties could show some good will toward the smaller. For next year’s legislative elections, for example, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) are cooperating, and the TSU has agreed to only seek legislator-at-large seats. However, the KMT is constantly quarreling with the PFP and the New Party over party autonomy issues, despite KMT claims that they are on friendly terms, and will only let the smaller parties field candidates in districts where it does not expect to do well.
In the past few elections, neither the KMT, DPP or the PFP have mustered a legislative majority, but in the 2008 legislative elections, the KMT, including the PFP and the New Party, gained 81 of the 113 seats, while the DPP won only 27 seats, giving the KMT the “total power” it was aiming for. The legislative chaos continued, mainly because of the parties’ selfishness and the constant battles between the pan-blue and pan-green camps, as well as the uneven quality of legislators.
Now the PFP suggests that a legislature where none of the three biggest parties reach an absolute majority is what we need. To win enough votes to be able to promote legislative reform, the PFP will need new ideas. If all the party wants is three legislators to be able to organize a legislative party caucus or if they fail to secure as many seats proportionally as they won in the 2001 legislative elections — when they gained 46 seats against the DPP’s 87, the KMT’s 68, the TSU’s 13 and independent candidates’ 11 seats — they will be in trouble. If they don’t get at least 10 seats, they will not be strong enough.
The situation in the past was very different and some political scientists are already predicting that electoral alliances and coalition governments will become unavoidable.
It’s no longer a matter of whether or not we want it, but one of timing and finding the right partner. If the government or the opposition lacks a grasp of the overall situation, they will not be able to keep up with changes and will fall behind.
In one sense, the president under Taiwan’s dual-executive system, also known as a semi-presidential system, has more power than a president in a presidential system. At times of national emergency, Taiwan’s president can even exercise emergency powers.
One would think, then, that a president supported by 7.65 million voters and who controls a legislative majority should be able to handle things smoothly. Instead, the efficiency of the leadership and political achievement are in direct inverse proportion to the government’s power. This is the main reason why Soong and the PFP are regaining popularity.
A comparison between the current opinion polls for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), DDP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Soong shows that Ma and Tsai are running neck and neck, while Soong, although he has not announced his candidacy, already has the support of more than 10 percent of voters, three times the number of signatures — 250,000 — needed to launch a run for the presidency.
Extrapolating from the average percentage of votes gained in the past few elections, PFP support stands at about 10 to 15 percent, more than the 5 percent threshold for entry into the legislature. The PFP has received 15.8 percent support in recent opinion polls. However, the party will face a severe challenge in the 28 constituencies where the KMT traditionally wins and the 20 constituencies where the DPP traditionally wins.
The PFP is estimated to win at least 10 at-large and constituency legislative seats. Combined with the expected increase in the number of seats for the pan-green camp, this would cause the KMT to lose at least 20 seats, in which case none of the three parties would gain an absolute majority.
Timing and circumstances create successful people, and with these factors on Soong’s side, he could well make a comeback. However, election results over the past 10 years show that voters are becoming increasingly independent and that is what will bring about political reform.
.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.