Commenting on the recent interaction between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP), former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) said in an interview on Thursday last week that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), the current KMT chairman, was a righteous and honest person, but that he was not particularly adept when it came to negotiating this kind of issue.
Wu said Ma had done his best and that he hoped things would work out right. As for PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), Wu said that he was a mild-mannered person who was open to communication. Wu praised both men as being good and sincere people, but he did not explain why these two good people are finding it so hard to talk to each other.
Actually, the main bone of contention between the KMT and the PFP is that the KMT wants the two parties to jointly nominate legislative district candidates based on who gets the top score in opinion polls, but the PFP is finding it difficult to meet this proposal. The PFP’s problem is it can only put forward candidates for at-large legislative seats if it nominates at least 10 district candidates.
Most people will find this puzzling. Why is it the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) can go ahead and put forward candidates for at-large legislative seats without nominating any district candidates, and yet the PFP has to propose 10 or more district candidates before it can draw up a party list?
The answer is to be found in Article 24, Paragraph 4 of the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), which lays out the conditions for political parties to propose candidates for at-large legislative seats.
Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph 4 describes one of the four possible conditions, which is that the party in question must have attained 2 percent or more of all votes cast in the three most recent national elections for at-large legislative seats and those representing citizens residing overseas.
Although this regulation talks about the three most recent national elections for at-large and expatriate legislative seats, actually there was until recently no vote for at-large seats — in other words, voters could only for a candidate, not a party. It was not until the most recent legislative election, in 2008, that a two-vote system was introduced, allowing voters to cast one vote for a candidate and another for a party. For that reason, the only at-large votes available for counting are those from the 2008 election. The TSU meets this requirement, but the PFP does not, because while the TSU had its own party list in the last legislative election all the PFP’s at-large candidates were co-nominated by the KMT, and so were included in the KMT party list.
The PFP officially only nominated one Aboriginal candidate in the 2008 election; all its district and at-large nominees were co-nominated by the KMT. In effect, the PFP joined the KMT and became a faction inside the bigger pan-blue party. Since Ma and his team took office, they have ostracized local factions and the PFP has been no exception.
The Chung Hsing Bills Finance case is the biggest albatross around Soong’s neck. When prosecutors decided not to indict Soong, the KMT fully accepted the decision and did not pursue the matter any further, because Soong and then-KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) had patched up their differences. However, after Ma took office, the KMT leadership overturned the policy decision made under Lien’s chairmanship, and, when Soong withdrew the NT$240 million (US$8.3 million) associated with the Chung Hsing case from his account, the KMT immediately took steps to recover it.
Only parties that have a legislative caucus can get close to the center of power. Parties that have no elected legislators are like toothless tigers — try as they might, they won’t scare anyone. The PFP has no legislators, and that makes Soong a toothless tiger. Even if he has been treated unfairly, he just has to swallow it.
Subparagraph 1 of Article 24 lists another condition under which parties can propose a list of candidates for at-large legislative seats. It stipulates that the candidates proposed by the party in question must have won 2 percent of more of the total valid votes cast in the most recent presidential election. Soong did not stand in the last presidential election, so this condition does not apply to the PFP as grounds for proposing at-large legislative candidates.
If the PFP does not take part in elections for legislative seats this time and Soong is once more absent from the presidential race, then the PFP could fade away.
The PFP did not take part in the legislative or presidential elections last time, so it has already faded away to a large extent.
Soong has to face up to this reality, but this time Ma has given the PFP a chance to come back from the dead because so many people are unhappy with the Ma administration’s performance. That resentment, coupled with the friction between the governing team and local factions, has produced a lot of swing voters. If the PFP can win over these undecided voters, it has a chance to get its foot back in the political door.
The main concern for the PFP is how to survive as a party, while some people are accusing Soong of undermining pan-blue “unity.” These critics don’t care very much whether Soong is treated fairly or not.
The 18th-century English writer Samuel Johnson once said that “patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.” Is not “unity” also a scoundrel’s refuge, in this case?
Chen Mao-hsiung is a retired National Sun Yat-sen University professor and chairman of the Society for the Promotion of Taiwanese Security.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known affectionately as “Big S,” recently passed away from pneumonia caused by the flu. The Mandarin word for the flu — which translates to “epidemic cold” in English — is misleading. Although the flu tends to spread rapidly and shares similar symptoms with the common cold, its name easily leads people to underestimate its dangers and delay seeking medical treatment. The flu is an acute viral respiratory illness, and there are vaccines to prevent its spread and strengthen immunity. This being the case, the Mandarin word for “influenza” used in Taiwan should be renamed from the misleading
Following a YouTuber’s warning that tens of thousands of Taiwanese have Chinese IDs, the government launched a nationwide probe and announced that it has revoked the Republic of China (Taiwan) citizenship of three Taiwanese who have Chinese IDs. Taiwanese rapper Pa Chiung (八炯) and YouTuber Chen Po-yuan (陳柏源) in December last year released a documentary showing conversations with Chinese “united front” related agency members and warned that there were 100,000 Taiwanese holding Chinese IDs. In the video, a Taiwanese named Lin Jincheng (林金城), who is wanted for fraud in Taiwan and has become the head of the Taiwan Youth Entrepreneurship Park