There is an Arabic word you come across a lot when Palestinians talk about their future. Sumud means steadfastness and it has turned into a strategy: When the imbalance of power is so pronounced, the most important thing to do is to stay put.
Staying put against overwhelming odds is regarded as a victory.
However, it is more than just a word. It is the look in Rifqua al-Kurd’s eyes as she fights eviction in Sheikh Jarrah, East Jerusalem. She lives out of boxes because when the police throw her out and the settlers move in she does not want the clothes thrown into the street.
Sumud is the tenacity with which Mohammed Hussein Jibor, a farmer, clings to a rock-strewn patch of land in the South Hebron hills in 38?C heat. His water cistern has been destroyed three times this year because he does not have a permit for it, even though the court acknowledges it is his land.
Sumud sums up the attitude of the Bedouins struggling to stay in 45 unrecognized villages in the Negev, without a supply of water, electricity or schools. Once the entire Negev was theirs, now only 6 percent is. Israel wants to put the Bedouins in townships while establishing 130 Jewish villages and agricultural settlements on the land.
“They want Jews to be Bedouin and Bedouins to be Ashkenaz [European Jews],” the Bedouin’s M ember of the Knesset Talab al-Sana said.
Sumud crops up in some unexpected places — not only East Jerusalem, the West Bank or Gaza, but in Jaffa, Lod and in Arab communities all throughout Israel. As next month looms and with it the attempt by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to get a declaration of statehood from the UN, the spotlight has swiveled on to these.
This is not a casual shift, as it could affect outcomes. If Israel ends its occupation of the West Bank and allows it to join with Gaza, the result could be two states — a Palestinian one alongside an Israeli one.
CIVIL RIGHTS
However, if you accompany that with a civil rights movement inside Israel, the goal could be very different — a secular, democratic state “for all its citizens,” where Jew, Christian and Muslim are equal.
A one-state solution in which Jewish citizens lose an inbuilt majority. The end of Zionism, no less.
More than 100,000 Arabs stayed on after 1948 and today number more than 1.5 million, roughly a fifth of the population of Israel. The ’48 Arabs, as they are known, are no longer seen as separate, exclusive or privileged. After so many years, their fight for civil rights within Israel is a struggle most Palestinians under occupation can identify with. It was not always thus.
They were known pejoratively as “insiders,” according to the dissident Israeli historian Ilan Pappe, who has written a book about them.
Trying to be “good Arabs” in Jewish eyes was tantamount to collaboration in Arab ones. However, much has changed.
“The people in the West Bank understood what the minorities inside Israel felt like, after years of deriding them for being lesser Palestinians, and that when the main impulse of the power that controls everything in your daily life is expulsionist, staying put is quite an achievement,” Pappe said.
Another historian, Sami Abu Shehadeh, is doing his doctoral thesis on Jaffa as the major Arab cultural and economic center during the Palestine Mandate period. It had its own Arabic press, eight cinemas, five hospitals and about 120,000 people. After the 1948 war, 3,900 were left.
FRAMING
It is standard practice for historians at Tel Aviv University to explain the time frame of their research. Shehadeh stopped his in 1948 because that was when Jaffa stopped existing as a city.
“My adviser told me: ‘Sami, we might agree or disagree on the word expelled, but I don’t know who will sit on your committee [to adjudicate the thesis] if you insist on using it,’” Shehadeh said.
A compromise was negotiated — rare in this part of the world.
Shehadeh wrote that, as a result of the war, the Arabs of Jaffa “had to leave and were not allowed back.”
“Forget politics, on the basic historical facts we fight on everything,” he said. “I don’t even know where to start a normal discussion. We live totally separate lives. Outsiders don’t see it. In Israel there are different spaces for Jews and Arabs. The problem is the vast majority of elites, and not just political, but economic and intellectual ones, define themselves as being part of a Jewish democracy and concentrate all their thinking on the rights of the Jews. Non-Jews, be they Christian or Muslim, are excluded from any serious decision-making process in their lives.”
That goes for the Israeli left as well as right. As a member of the Tel Aviv-Jaffa municipal council, Shehadeh tried to persuade Yael Dayan, the left-wing head of the coalition in charge of the council, to divide Tel Aviv-Jaffa into quarters, like any other big city. Maybe it is better for the Arabs of Jaffa if “we” keep on running things for them, Shehadeh was told.
“The only thing the world knows about Jaffa is oranges,” Shehadeh said. “I am not an orange. [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu called people like me a demographic time bomb. How can I explain to my children that they are a bomb?”
The discrimination suffered by his community is extensively documented. Half live below the poverty line, 48 percent can not build a house for the next 15 years because there are no permits or plans. Only 19 percent of Arab women with Israeli citizenship are in a job, compared with 65 percent of Jewish women.
However, the terrain of their changing identity and allegiance is not so well mapped. Israel demands expressions of loyalty from them.
Loyalty to what, they ask. A democracy or a supremacist state?
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic