After 23 years behind bars as his murder and kidnapping trials dragged on, Chiou Ho-shun (邱和順) finally knows his fate — he has been sentenced to be killed by the state.
Taiwan’s longest-lasting legal case came to an abrupt close on Friday last week, in a way that reaffirms both the need to reform the nation’s judicial system and the inherent difficulty of doing so.
The Chiou trial had been cited for years by judicial reform advocates as an example of the need to pass an act that would speed up legal procedures, finally resulting in the Speedy Criminal Trials Act (刑事妥速審判法), which sets a maximum detention period of eight years for accused murderers. However, the Supreme Court’s recent decision to uphold his controversial death sentence shows how even with the best of intentions, judicial reform can backfire.
Given the entrenched culture of “face” in the judicial system in Taiwan, prosecutors and judges do everything they can to avoid ever admitting that they were wrong, especially in cases of this magnitude that have been shunted back and forth for years.
In the case of Chiou, who was accused of kidnapping and murdering a nine-year-old boy more than two decades ago, prosecutors relied solely on dubious confessions that were allegedly obtained through the use of threats and torture.
Although Chiou’s guilt in another murder case — the kidnapping and killing of insurance agent Ko Hung Yu-lan (柯洪玉蘭) — is fairly cut and dry, it was much harder to link him to the slaying of the nine-year-old Lu Cheng (陸正): There was no forensic evidence to back up the case — no murder weapon, no body and no clothing belonging to the victim. However, the courts admitted the suspect’s confessions to the crime because to throw them out would have meant admitting they had been obtained wrongfully or faked altogether.
Amazingly, this “evidence” was still deemed admissible even after two prosecutors and 10 police officers involved in the case were impeached for using violence to obtain a speedy confession.
To some observers, it has long been obvious that the Chiou case was problematic. Charges were dropped against most of the defendants, barring Chiou and two accomplices, as discrepancies and contradictions emerged in the accounts of those involved.
However, dropping the case entirely without a fall guy would have required prosecutors, police and judges to admit to completely fouling up the case and in the minds of those running the courts, that would have been tantamount to admitting that the judicial system had failed.
The case was kicked back and forth like a soccer ball, with seemingly no end in sight. The High Court did not want to drop the charges, but the Supreme Court did not want to uphold them. In the meantime, Chiou spent most of his adult life in jail.
After years of this farcical situation, along came the Speedy Criminal Trials Act, which judicial reform activists hoped would finally put an end to never--ending cases like Chiou’s. However, they underestimated the culture of “face” and the determination of the courts to protect their reputation at any cost.
With just a year to go before Chiou’s case would have run out of time and the courts would have been forced to drop the case, the Supreme Court apparently felt that time had come for it to clean its docket.
Instead of doing the right thing and dropping the charges against Chiou for the murder of Lu Cheng, the Supreme Court upheld the death penalty, exhausting Chiou’s final appeal on that case.
It is high time Taiwan’s judicial system embraced respect for human life and judicial common sense, but as this case proves, single laws intended to regulate the actions of the courts are simply not enough to change an ingrained culture that has become a law unto itself.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press