Set in the foothills of the Himalayas, Dharamsala, India, is the seat of Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama and the headquarters for the eight Tibetan exile settlements throughout India. To establish their refugee status in India, each of the 180,000 Tibetans is given a personal audience with the Dalai Lama.
During the past decades, many young Tibetans, starved of their culture and facing repression by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), have trekked across the Himalayas to India. This process was anecdotally recorded in the moving documentary The Cry of the Snow Lion.
There in the Himalayas, the mountaineers witnessed the Chinese People’s Liberation Army intercept and murder a 17-year-old Tibetan woman in one of the groups that was fleeing across the snow from Tibet. This tragic process of defection was also illustrated to a delegation of Australians who recently met the Dalai Lama, by the 2,800 children living in boarding schools at Dharmasala’s Tibetan Children Village. Generations of Tibetan children, mainly aged six to 10, have been cared for and educated in the village. They are sent by their parents to India, often without the hope of seeing each other again.
Tibetans around the world have been agitated about the recent crackdown at the Kriti Monastery in Tibet, where Chinese authorities have enforced a “patriotic re-education campaign” and imposed an indefinite ban on religious activities. Three hundred monks have also been “removed.” On April 21, a large group of Tibetans stood guard at the monastery to prevent the Chinese forces from removing monks — the crowd was dispersed by the police, who used indiscriminate force. Two elderly Tibetans were beaten to death.
At Dharamsala, the Central Tibetan Administration attempts to replicate all the functions of a state. These functions include the Kashang (Tibetans’ elected parliament), a Tibetan education system, state archives, medical institutes and the Norblinka Institute of Art, where 400 sponsored artists maintain the traditions of their ancient culture.
As the Dalai Lama withdraws from front-line leadership (he is 75), Tibetans have a plan to ensure their immediate political future.
Regarding the election of a new Tibetan prime minister, the British newspaper the Guardian recently wrote: “Tibetans around the world have voted a Harvard law professor as their political leader, in the first election since the Dalai Lama, who is 75, announced that he would give up the political leadership of the Tibetan community in exile. The new prime minister, the 42-year old Lobsang Sangay, polled 27,051 votes, 55 percent of the total electorate, to beat two other secular candidates.”
Sangay was declared the third kalon tripa (prime minister). This is part of the wider Tibetan community’s plan to survive outside of Tibet when the Dali Lama dies.
The new kalon tripa has previously hinted he could move beyond the Dalai Lama’s “middle way” policy of negotiating with China for autonomy in Tibet.
As a student in New Delhi, he was a leader of the Tibetan Youth Congress, which champions complete Tibetan independence.
The Dalai Lama acknowledged to our delegation that his moderate “third way,” which sought Tibetan authority within a Chinese federation, had not been successful, but that the uprising in March 2008 showed the Chinese had to deal with “the issue.”
He told us that the crackdown at the Kriti Monastery may be part of Beijing’s fear about the implications of the “Jasmine Revolution” in the Middle East and that mistrust underlies the communist regime. The Dalai Lama claimed the Chinese budget for internal security was more than the budget for external security.
After the “disappearance” of the five-year-old Panchen Lama (the second-most important Tibetan religious figure) 15 years ago, the Chinese government now says it has to approve all reincarnations of living Buddhas or senior religious figures in Tibetan Buddhism, including the choice of the next Dalai Lama.
The Tibetan exiles expect that when the Dalai Lama dies, the Chinese will try to control the discovery of his successor so that the next Dalai Lama will be under Beijing’s control, as the Panchen Lama now is. The Tibetans’ plan to develop new forms of leadership outside Chinese control is designed to circumvent this.
Both the Tibetan institutions in Dharamsala and reinvigorated Tibetan political structure are part of the Tibetan exiles’ plans to outlast the Chinese occupation of Tibet. The Dalai Lama’s alternative plans for his successor as spiritual leader shows the old fox has a multilevel strategy to outlast the seemingly awesome power of the CCP.
Michael Danby is an Australian member of parliament.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS