What would you do if your financial planner prescribed the following advice? Save and invest diligently for 30 years, then cross your fingers and pray your investments will double during the last decade before you retire.
You might as well go to Las Vegas, Nevada.
Yet that’s exactly what many professionals and financial calculators have been telling consumers for years, said Michael Kitces, director of research at the Pinnacle Advisory Group in Columbia, Maryland, who recently illustrated this notion in his blog, Nerd’s Eye View.
The advice is never delivered in those exact words, of course. Instead, this is the more familiar refrain: Save a healthy slice of your salary from the beginning of your career, invest it in a diversified portfolio and then you should be able to retire with relative ease.
The problem is that even if you do everything right and save at a respectable rate, you’re still relying on the market to push you to the finish line in the last decade before retirement.
Why? Reaching your goal is highly dependent on the power of compounding — or the snowball effect, where your pile of money grows at a faster clip as more interest (or investment growth) grows on top of more interest. In fact, you’re actually counting on your savings, in real US dollars, to double during that home stretch.
However, if you’re dealt a bad set of returns during an extended period of time just before you retire or shortly thereafter, your plan could be thrown wildly off track. Many baby boomers know the feeling all too well, given the stock market’s weak showing during the last decade.
“The way the math really works out is unbelievably dependent on the final few years,” Kitces said. “I just don’t think we’ve really acknowledged just what a leap the very last part really is.”
TOUGH TO SWALLOW
Consider the numbers for a 26-year-old who earns US$40,000 annually, with a long-term savings target of US$1 million. To get there, she’s told to save 8 percent of her salary each year during her 40-year career. (We assumed an annual investment return of 7 percent and 3 percent annual salary growth to keep pace with inflation). Yet after 31 years of diligent savings, her portfolio is worth just slightly more than US$483,000.
To clear the US$1 million mark, her portfolio essentially must double in the nine years before she retires and the market must cooperate (unless she finds a way to travel back in time and significantly increase her savings).
However, should the markets misbehave, delivering a mere 2 percent return during the 10 years before retirement (not all that hard to imagine, considering the return of a portfolio split between stock and bonds during the past decade), she falls short by about a third. Her portfolio would be worth only about US$640,000.
You can quibble with our assumptions in this example. However, a similar pattern emerges regardless of your financial targets and projected returns, Kitces said. So if your target is to save US$500,000 or US$2 million, and if you assume a 6 percent return or a higher 10 percent, your investments will still roughly double in the final years before retirement.
Of course, an extended period of dismal returns during any point in your career can inflict damage. However, the homestretch before retirement is often the most anxiety-inducing because workers have neither the time nor the financial capacity to recover before they begin taking withdrawals.
“Getting the bad 2 percent decade in the earlier years has far less impact because there are fewer contributions impacted,” Kitces said. “Conversely, when the bad returns come in the final 10 years, no reasonable amount of savings will make up the shortfall.”
So what’s an investor to do about all of this, especially as one of the other pillars of retirement savings — pensions — disappears? And who’s to say how the US Social Security system may change by the time that 26-year-old retires?
Most of the solutions, if you can call them that, fall into the “easier said than done” category.
If you can’t handle the uncertainty of missing your financial targets, you can try to save more and create a less volatile portfolio, Kitces said, which may also provide a firmer retirement date.
MORE THAN EXPECTED
And naturally, the earlier you start saving, the sooner you’re likely to reach the critical mass you’ll need for compounding to accelerate (assuming the markets provide some lift in the first half of your career). However, you will need to save more than many retirement calculators suggest, since they’re likely to recommend saving a lower amount when you have such a long time horizon. Then you can end up in the same predicament, where you are heavily leaning on market returns in the years before retirement.
“What the wise person does is save a large amount of money when they are young,” said William Bernstein, author of The Investor’s Manifesto: Preparing for Prosperity, Armageddon and Everything in Between and other investing books. “And if they can do that, when they are older, they can cut back on their equity allocation. When you’ve won the game, you stop playing the game.”
However, that can be hard to accomplish when you have other needs competing for those US dollars, whether it’s a down payment for a house, a college savings plan or starting a business. Or perhaps you’re already living on less because you’re unemployed (or underemployed) or because health insurance consumes a significant chunk of your income.
“It’s the cruel irony of retirement planning that those people who most need the markets’ help have the least financial capacity to take the risk,” said Milo Benningfield, a financial planner in San Francisco. “Meanwhile, the people who can afford the risk are the ones who least need to take it.”
A more prudent course of action is a flexible one that acknowledges the many possibilities and accounts for ideal and less-than-ideal spending amounts.
Try using different assumptions for the years leading up to retirement, said Scott Hanson, a financial planner at Hanson McClain in Sacramento, California. If you want to retire in 25 years, for instance, you might use a return assumption of 8 percent for the first 15 years of savings, then reduce that rate to 6 percent or less in the final decade, he said.
“Here’s the catch: Most folks aren’t saving enough using standard growth assumptions,” he said. “If they begin to use lower growth assumptions in order to ensure their retirement, they’ll fall further behind and become even more discouraged.”
However, simply going through these exercises may help the reality sink in. At the very least, it will show how imprecise even the most sophisticated projections may be.
“The actual date I get to check out with my target sum to retirement is much more uncertain than we give it credit to be,” Kitces said. “It’s more like 40 years, plus or minus five to 10 years.”
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS