What would you do if your financial planner prescribed the following advice? Save and invest diligently for 30 years, then cross your fingers and pray your investments will double during the last decade before you retire.
You might as well go to Las Vegas, Nevada.
Yet that’s exactly what many professionals and financial calculators have been telling consumers for years, said Michael Kitces, director of research at the Pinnacle Advisory Group in Columbia, Maryland, who recently illustrated this notion in his blog, Nerd’s Eye View.
The advice is never delivered in those exact words, of course. Instead, this is the more familiar refrain: Save a healthy slice of your salary from the beginning of your career, invest it in a diversified portfolio and then you should be able to retire with relative ease.
The problem is that even if you do everything right and save at a respectable rate, you’re still relying on the market to push you to the finish line in the last decade before retirement.
Why? Reaching your goal is highly dependent on the power of compounding — or the snowball effect, where your pile of money grows at a faster clip as more interest (or investment growth) grows on top of more interest. In fact, you’re actually counting on your savings, in real US dollars, to double during that home stretch.
However, if you’re dealt a bad set of returns during an extended period of time just before you retire or shortly thereafter, your plan could be thrown wildly off track. Many baby boomers know the feeling all too well, given the stock market’s weak showing during the last decade.
“The way the math really works out is unbelievably dependent on the final few years,” Kitces said. “I just don’t think we’ve really acknowledged just what a leap the very last part really is.”
TOUGH TO SWALLOW
Consider the numbers for a 26-year-old who earns US$40,000 annually, with a long-term savings target of US$1 million. To get there, she’s told to save 8 percent of her salary each year during her 40-year career. (We assumed an annual investment return of 7 percent and 3 percent annual salary growth to keep pace with inflation). Yet after 31 years of diligent savings, her portfolio is worth just slightly more than US$483,000.
To clear the US$1 million mark, her portfolio essentially must double in the nine years before she retires and the market must cooperate (unless she finds a way to travel back in time and significantly increase her savings).
However, should the markets misbehave, delivering a mere 2 percent return during the 10 years before retirement (not all that hard to imagine, considering the return of a portfolio split between stock and bonds during the past decade), she falls short by about a third. Her portfolio would be worth only about US$640,000.
You can quibble with our assumptions in this example. However, a similar pattern emerges regardless of your financial targets and projected returns, Kitces said. So if your target is to save US$500,000 or US$2 million, and if you assume a 6 percent return or a higher 10 percent, your investments will still roughly double in the final years before retirement.
Of course, an extended period of dismal returns during any point in your career can inflict damage. However, the homestretch before retirement is often the most anxiety-inducing because workers have neither the time nor the financial capacity to recover before they begin taking withdrawals.
“Getting the bad 2 percent decade in the earlier years has far less impact because there are fewer contributions impacted,” Kitces said. “Conversely, when the bad returns come in the final 10 years, no reasonable amount of savings will make up the shortfall.”
So what’s an investor to do about all of this, especially as one of the other pillars of retirement savings — pensions — disappears? And who’s to say how the US Social Security system may change by the time that 26-year-old retires?
Most of the solutions, if you can call them that, fall into the “easier said than done” category.
If you can’t handle the uncertainty of missing your financial targets, you can try to save more and create a less volatile portfolio, Kitces said, which may also provide a firmer retirement date.
MORE THAN EXPECTED
And naturally, the earlier you start saving, the sooner you’re likely to reach the critical mass you’ll need for compounding to accelerate (assuming the markets provide some lift in the first half of your career). However, you will need to save more than many retirement calculators suggest, since they’re likely to recommend saving a lower amount when you have such a long time horizon. Then you can end up in the same predicament, where you are heavily leaning on market returns in the years before retirement.
“What the wise person does is save a large amount of money when they are young,” said William Bernstein, author of The Investor’s Manifesto: Preparing for Prosperity, Armageddon and Everything in Between and other investing books. “And if they can do that, when they are older, they can cut back on their equity allocation. When you’ve won the game, you stop playing the game.”
However, that can be hard to accomplish when you have other needs competing for those US dollars, whether it’s a down payment for a house, a college savings plan or starting a business. Or perhaps you’re already living on less because you’re unemployed (or underemployed) or because health insurance consumes a significant chunk of your income.
“It’s the cruel irony of retirement planning that those people who most need the markets’ help have the least financial capacity to take the risk,” said Milo Benningfield, a financial planner in San Francisco. “Meanwhile, the people who can afford the risk are the ones who least need to take it.”
A more prudent course of action is a flexible one that acknowledges the many possibilities and accounts for ideal and less-than-ideal spending amounts.
Try using different assumptions for the years leading up to retirement, said Scott Hanson, a financial planner at Hanson McClain in Sacramento, California. If you want to retire in 25 years, for instance, you might use a return assumption of 8 percent for the first 15 years of savings, then reduce that rate to 6 percent or less in the final decade, he said.
“Here’s the catch: Most folks aren’t saving enough using standard growth assumptions,” he said. “If they begin to use lower growth assumptions in order to ensure their retirement, they’ll fall further behind and become even more discouraged.”
However, simply going through these exercises may help the reality sink in. At the very least, it will show how imprecise even the most sophisticated projections may be.
“The actual date I get to check out with my target sum to retirement is much more uncertain than we give it credit to be,” Kitces said. “It’s more like 40 years, plus or minus five to 10 years.”
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic