It looks like the Grinch really has stolen Christmas — no, not today — but the many Christmases to come. The recently inked cross-strait medical and health cooperation pact will ensure this.
The accord provides for the exchange of information and cooperation in fighting infectious diseases, cracking down on counterfeit medicines and products, ensuring drug safety and establishing cooperation in clinical trials. The Department of Health said the pact would bring standards and norms for medical products on both sides of the Taiwan Strait into line with each other. For example, Chinese exporters of herbal medicines will have to produce certification on the safety of their products, safety checks must meet international standards and products will undergo three rounds of inspection. It sounds too good to be true, because it is.
To say that a pact dealing with public health was seen as easier to ink than one on investment protection, which had been scheduled to be signed this week as well, is mind-boggling would be an understatement. That more time was needed to ensure the safety of Taiwanese corporations and businesspeople, but not the health of the 23 million people of this nation, is truly sickening.
Of course, the investment pact has all those niggling details about business rights, treatment of investors, expropriation of property, compensation, dispute settlement and so on. Taiwanese businesspeople can get pretty heated about those — as can politicians, who have their own investments in China, or those of close relatives, to worry about.
It is so much easier to reach an accord on medical matters when you know the other side will just lie anyway. Why worry about frank disclosure with a government that has prevaricated, stonewalled and covered up one medical nightmare after another — the spread of AIDS through unhygienic blood collection and transfusions, SARS, harvesting of organs from executed prisoners, contamination of milk powder and other products, swine flu, etc, etc, etc.
Why not ask doctors Gao Yaojie (高耀潔) and Jiang Yanyong (蔣彥永) about what it’s like to “work with” Beijing in trying to fight the spread of infectious disease, or Zhao Lianhai (趙連海) about campaigning for product safety?
The 84-year-old Gao was persecuted and finally driven from China for raising attention about and treating villagers infected with HIV through contaminated blood transfusions and blood donation procedures. Jiang, the army surgeon who blew the lid off Beijing’s SARS cover-up in 2003, was first hailed as a hero and then reviled when he tried to draw attention to other issues. Zhao was sentenced last month to two-and-a-half years in jail for establishing a Web site, “Kidney Stone Babies,” for parents of children who became ill after consuming melamine-contaminated milk powder. He was found guilty of “inciting social disorder” after his initial arrest in December last year on a charge of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.”
Yes, Taiwan’s government has just signed an agreement with a regime that has proven time and again that it is willing to sacrifice hundreds and thousands of its own people to ensure its continued rule. So while the freshly inked pact talks about raising medical and drug standards on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, it’s hard to see how Taiwan’s standards have anywhere to go but down.
Unlike Dr Seuss’ tale, there’s unlikely to be any change of heart in the Presidential Office or Zhongnanhai that would see the Grinches returning what they have stolen from the Whos as they slept. In real life, the Whos must wake up and prepare to fight to retain their rights and protections — through the ballot box, through protests and by refusing to accept a fait accompli.
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her