Beyond the headlines, the embarrassment of governments and the blow dealt to the secrecy of diplomatic correspondence, WikiLeaks’ exposure of US diplomatic cables offers a raw illustration of how deeply the essence of power has been altered in our information age.
Since its inception, the state has been the main vessel of power — access to power usually meant control of the state, whether by election or by violent takeover. This model, within which individuals are subjects, or, at best, taxpayers and voters, is being undermined by several recent trends that have empowered the individual.
Consider the Internet, a network of connected nodes invented at the height of the Cold War to preserve the US from total chaos after a nuclear attack on its nerve centers. It was deliberately constructed with no hierarchy, no core and no central authority, though few at the time could have suspected where, given the numerous breakthroughs of the digital revolution, the Internet’s built-in trend toward decentralized power would lead.
It has led to a second trend — a metamorphosis of the production process. Information has become much more than a message conveyed by technology — it is now the raw material of services-intensive advanced economies, the building block of modern social and productive organizations.
The third trend concerns the room this has opened for individual and collective action.
In The Human Condition, the philosopher Hannah Arendt linked politics to the human capacity not simply to act, but to “act in concert.” While concerted action is a familiar notion, it used to be aimed mainly at influencing the state — exemplified by the way civil society prompted the US withdrawal from Vietnam.
Today, however, collective action is of a different magnitude. Because of the universality of the digital language, its ease of use and the virtual absence of marginal costs for producing or disseminating information, the state’s tools of control have been weakened and depleted.
Global finance has been one of the most eager beneficiaries of these trends, using Internet networks not just as a tool to conduct operations with greater efficiency and velocity, but also as a means to circumvent state supervision. Corporations have used connectivity to globalize their markets, research and development, ownership, tax domiciliation, and leadership, thoroughly transforming their relationship with states, whether in their country of origin or elsewhere.
In September 1992, it took George Soros US$10 billion to bring the Bank of England to its knees and impose devaluation on the British pound. It now takes only a computer and Internet connection to cause serious trouble — intrusion by hackers into protected networks, or the introduction of havoc-wreaking software viruses and worms in sensitive information systems.
While the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 — the deadliest of all time — had nothing “virtual” about them, their perpetrator, al-Qaeda, projects a cloud of threat and power by using cyberspace to promote its bloody “successes,” spread hatred and recruit jihadists.
Of course, access to a networked world has also balanced state power in positive ways, by giving a formidable boost to independent advocacy, as seen in the online campaign to ban land mines and the treaty that ratified its success — despite opposition by powerful states. Many similar organizations have flourished, gaining the ability to shape political outcomes and public policies.
However, there is no place where the transformative power of connectivity is potentially greater than in China, with its reported 420 million Internet users. No matter how eager China’s authorities are to keep the Internet under their control — for example, by blocking foreign Web sites — they are also aware of how much their economy now needs the Internet.
As a result, the room for “concerted action” has never been so large for individual Chinese to gain access to uncensored information, share opinions and communicate nationwide to expose official misconduct.
Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) was jailed for circulating on the Internet his proposal for a truly democratic constitution, Charter 08, which gathered 10,000 signatures online in only 24 hours. In the late 1980s, glasnost — transparency — was one of the nails in the coffin of the Soviet Union.
While WikiLeaks has certainly not had a similar effect, it epitomizes the extent of the individual’s empowerment in a networked world. All that was necessary to challenge the world’s mightiest power, after all, was a disgruntled US Army intelligence analyst, some hacking knowledge, a few computers and a handful of determined activists enrolled under the contested banner of transparency.
At the time she was named director of policy planning at the US State Department, Anne-Marie Slaughter, a respected academic in international affairs, boldly heralded the advent of a networked world.
“War, diplomacy, business, media, society ... are networked,” she wrote in Foreign Affairs in January last year, and “in this world, the measure of power is connectedness.”
Having the greatest potential for connectivity, the US has the edge in a “networked century.”
This drive prompted US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in January to proclaim the “freedom to connect” as the cyber-equivalent of the more familiar freedoms of assembly or expression. Of course, Clinton added, these technologies are not an unmitigated blessing and can be misused for darker purposes, but her list of the potential abuses of the connected world contained nothing similar to the WikiLeaks storm.
That storm will leave behind no trace of understanding if it is assessed in isolation, rather than as part of a broader pattern. WikiLeaks’ latest release demonstrates that the transformation of power by the “digital revolution” could be as far-reaching as that brought about by the 15th century printing revolution.
In this game, where new players invite themselves, the edge goes to agility and innovation.
All of this implies that connectedness will remain a double-edged sword — the leverage it provides being fraught with vulnerability — and that means that we can count on more surprises in store for states.
Pierre Buhler is a former French diplomat and a former associate professor at Sciences Po in Paris.
Copyright: Project Syndicate/Institute for Human Sciences
Although former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo — known for being the most pro-Taiwan official to hold the post — is not in the second administration of US president-elect Donald Trump, he has maintained close ties with the former president and involved himself in think tank activities, giving him firsthand knowledge of the US’ national strategy. On Monday, Pompeo visited Taiwan for the fourth time, attending a Formosa Republican Association’s forum titled “Towards Permanent World Peace: The Shared Mission of the US and Taiwan.” At the event, he reaffirmed his belief in Taiwan’s democracy, liberty, human rights and independence, highlighting a
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) last week released the latest job vacancy data in Taiwan, which highlighted how many job openings firms had yet to be filled at the end of August last year. The data also revealed how the vacant positions were closely related to the business climate that industrial and services sectors faced at the time. The DGBAS collects data on job vacancies at the end of February, May, August and November every year. The number of job vacancies includes recruits for expanding operations and additional production lines as well as for openings related to
The Legislative Yuan passed legislation on Tuesday aimed at supporting the middle-aged generation — defined as people aged 55 or older willing and able to work — in a law initially proposed by Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Wu Chun-cheng (吳春城) to help the nation transition from an aged society to a super-aged society. The law’s passage was celebrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the TPP. The brief show of unity was welcome news, especially after 10 months of political fighting and unconstitutional amendments that are damaging democracy and the constitutional order, eliciting concern
RSS