In the recent special municipality elections, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) only just managed to hold onto its control of Taipei City, Sinbei City (the name to be given to an upgraded Taipei County on Dec. 25) and Greater Taichung, while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) held on to Tainan and Kaohsiung. The DPP also gained more votes than the KMT. While cross-strait issues were not a main focus of the elections, the results will definitely have an impact on the future development of cross-strait relations.
Cross-strait relations focus on three main points, the first being the [so-called] “1992 consensus” and the idea of “one China, each side with its own interpretation.”
The second point is the way Taiwan defers to China politically. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government have done so in many ways. For example, they have decreased their support of human rights and democracy in China, agreed to seek China’s permission before taking part in international organizations and not oppose China over international issues.
The third issue is China’s economic concessions toward Taiwan. Over the last two-and-a-half years, cross-strait trade has been deregulated rapidly and a major part of this has come from China making asymmetrical or unilateral concessions in favor of Taiwan. However, the relaxation in cross-strait tensions is rather superficial. Cross-strait relations still contain three major areas of conflict. The first is politics. China constantly stresses that Taiwan and China must strengthen mutual political trust and engage in negotiations on political issues, which implies China does not trust the Ma administration.
The second area is diplomacy. While Taiwan has not lost any diplomatic allies over the last two years, it has had only limited success in increasing its international presence.
The third area is military affairs. The Ma administration has demanded that China repeal laws allowing the use of military force against Taiwan and redeploy missiles aimed at Taiwan, while China has responded by saying Taiwanese independence activists continue to undermine moves toward peaceful cross-strait development.
From Beijing’s -perspective, its anti-independence and pro-unification position has had only a limited effect. In terms of anti-independence, the Ma government says it does not support Taiwanese independence, while also openly telling the world that Taiwan is an independent and sovereign nation.
In terms of China’s moves to promote unification, public support for the idea of a Taiwanese identity has increased over the last two-and-a-half years, while there has been no increase in support for unification and no decrease in support for independence. Instead, support for maintaining the “status quo” has indefinitely increased.
Returning to the effects of the special municipality elections on cross-strait relations, the Ma administration basically remains the party China wants to support in Taiwan, and it will therefore continue to promote cross-strait economic and social exchanges to help Ma get re-elected.
If China tones down its military threats — missile deployments — or does less to block Taiwan’s international presence, it is likely to demand that the Ma administration agree to specific political guarantees as a quid pro quo. However, that presents too much of a risk to Ma’s re-election chances and is therefore highly unlikely.
Having been taught a lesson in the recent special municipality elections, the Ma administration will not sign such an agreement with China before the 2012 presidential elections. Until then, Taiwan and China are more likely to complete talks on cultural and educational exchanges as this is still in line with China’s pro-unification views.
Lastly, given the DPP’s growing political clout, China will probably establish stronger lines of communication with the DPP. The results of the latest election show that DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) views were supported by a majority of voters.
After the recent elections, Tsai was quick to show that she will strengthen her focus on cross-strait policy and that she is willing to engage in dialogue with China in order to overcome problems caused by a lack of political trust. This would seem to imply that the DPP will work harder to forge intra-party consensus on China policy while gradually initiating talks with China.
Tung Chen-yuan is a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS