It is, according to one breathless blogger, “the first great cyber war,” or as those behind it put it more prosaically: “The major shitstorm has begun.”
The febrile technological and commercial skirmishes over WikiLeaks escalated into a full-blown online assault on Wednesday when, in a major breach of Internet security, a concerted online attack by activist supporters of WikiLeaks succeeded in disrupting MasterCard.
The act was in explicit “revenge” for the international credit card company’s decision on Monday to freeze all payments to the site, blaming illegal activity. Though it initially would acknowledge no more than “heavy traffic on its external corporate Web site,” MasterCard was forced to admit last night that it had experienced “a service disruption to the MasterCard directory server,” which banking sources claimed meant major disruption throughout its global business.
Illustration: Tania
The company said its systems had not been compromised by the “concentrated effort” to flood its corporate Web site with “traffic and slow access.”
“We are working to restore normal service levels,” the company said in a statement. “There is no impact on our cardholders’ ability to use their cards for secure transactions globally.”
In an attack referred to as Operation Payback, a group of online activists calling themselves Anonymous said they had orchestrated a distributed denial of service (DDOS) attack on the site and issued threats against other businesses that have restricted WikiLeaks’s dealings.
Also targeted in a dramatic day of frenzied Internet activity were the Web site of the Swedish prosecution authority, which is currently seeking to extradite WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange, on sex assault charges against two Swedish women, and that of the Stockholm lawyer who represents them. The sites of US Senator Joe Lieberman and the former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, both vocal critics of Assange, were also attacked and disrupted, according to observers.
“We will fire at anything or anyone that tries to censor WikiLeaks, including multibillion-dollar companies such as PayPal,” an online statement said. “Twitter, you’re next for censoring WikiLeaks discussion. The major shitstorm has begun.”
Twitter has denied it has censored the hashtag, saying confusion had arisen over its “trending” facility.
Though DDOS attacks are not uncommon by groups of motivated activists, the scale and intensity of the online assault and the powerful commercial and political critics of WikiLeaks, ranged in opposition to the hackers, make this a high-stakes enterprise that could lead to uncharted territory in the Internet age.
A spokesman for the group, a 22-year-old from London who called himself Coldblood, said it was acting for the “chaotic good” in defense of Internet freedom of speech. It has been distributing software tools to allow anyone with a computer and an Internet connection to join in the attacks.
The group has already succeeded this week in bringing down the site of the Swiss bank PostFinance, which was successfully attacked on Monday after it shut down one of WikiLeaks’ key bank accounts, accusing Assange of lying. A PostFinance spokesman, Alex Josty, told reporters the Web site had buckled under a barrage of traffic.
“It was very, very difficult, then things improved overnight, but it’s still not entirely back to normal,” Josty said.
Amazon, which removed the site’s content from its EC2 cloud on Dec. 1, EveryDNS.net, which suspended dealings with Wiki-Leaks two days later, and Visa, which announced on Tuesday that it too would cease processing payments to WikiLeaks, may also be possible targets.
PayPal has also been the subject of a number of DDOS attacks — which often involve flooding the target site with requests so that it cannot cope with legitimate communication — since it suspended all payments to WikiLeaks last week. A PayPal spokesman said that while a site called ThePayPalBlog.com had been successfully silenced for a few hours, attempts to crash its online payment facilities had been unsuccessful.
The site, which is owned by eBay, appeared to suggest on Wednesday that this decision had been taken after an intervention by the US Department of State. PayPal’s vice-president of platform, Osama Bedier, told an Internet conference that the site had decided to freeze WikiLeaks’ account on Dec. 4 after government representatives said it was engaged in illegal activity.
“The state department told us these were illegal activities. It was straightforward,” he told the LeWeb conference in Paris, adding: “We ... comply with regulations around the world, making sure that we protect our brand.”
He later said that PayPal had not been contacted directly by the state department, but had seen a letter it had sent to Wiki-Leaks. However, his remarks will undoubtedly intensify criticism from supporters of WikiLeaks that the site is being targeted for political reasons.
That accusation was repeated on Wednesday after it emerged that Visa had forced a small IT firm that facilitates transfers made by credit cards including Visa and MasterCard, and has processed payments to WikiLeaks, to suspend all of its transactions — even those involving other payees. Visa had already cut off all donations being made through the firm to WikiLeaks.
DataCell, based in Iceland, said it would take “immediate legal action” and warned that the powerful “duopoly” of Visa and MasterCard could spell “the end of the credit card business worldwide.”
Andreas Fink, its chief executive, said in a statement: “Putting all payments on hold for seven days or more is one thing, but rejecting all further attempts to donate is making the donations impossible.”
“This does clearly create massive financial losses to Wiki-Leaks, which seems to be the only purpose of this suspension. This is not about the brand of Visa, this is about politics and Visa should not be involved in this ... It is obvious that Visa is under political pressure to close us down,” Fink said.
Operation Payback, which refers to itself as “an anonymous, decentralized movement that fights against censorship and copywrong,” argues that the actions taken by Visa, MasterCard and others “are long strides closer to a world where we cannot say what we think and are unable to express our opinions and ideas. We cannot let this happen. This is why our intention is to find out who is responsible for this failed attempt at censorship.”
The MasterCard action was confirmed on Twitter at 9:39am on Wednesday by user @Anon_Operation, who later tweeted: “We are glad to tell you that http://www.mastercard.com/ is down and it’s confirmed! #ddos #WikiLeaks Operation: Payback (is a bitch!) #PAYBACK”
The group, Coldblood said, is about 1,000 strong.
While most of its members are teenagers who are “trying to make an impact on what happens with the limited knowledge they have,” others include parents and IT professionals, he said.
Anonymous was born out of the influential Internet messageboard 4Chan in 2003, a forum popular with hackers and gamers. The group’s name is a tribute to 4Chan’s early days, when any posting to its forums where no name was given was ascribed to “Anonymous.”
However, the ephemeral group, which picks up causes “whenever it feels like it,” has now “gone beyond 4Chan into something bigger,” its spokesman said.
There is no real command structure; membership of the group has been described as being “like a flock of birds” — the only way you can identify members is by what they are doing together.
Essentially, once enough people on the 4Chan message boards decide some cause is worth pursuing in large enough numbers, it becomes an “Anonymous” cause.
“We’re against corporations and government interfering on the Internet,” Coldblood said. “We believe it should be open and free for everyone. Governments shouldn’t try to censor because they don’t agree with it. Anonymous is supporting WikiLeaks not because we agree or disagree with the data that is being sent out, but we disagree with any from of censorship on the Internet.”
On Wednesday night, Wiki-Leaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson said: “Anonymous ... is not affiliated with Wikileaks. There has been no contact between any Wikileaks staffer and anyone at Anonymous. We neither condemn nor applaud these attacks. We believe they are a reflection of public opinion on the actions of the targets.”
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
The Legislative Yuan passed legislation on Tuesday aimed at supporting the middle-aged generation — defined as people aged 55 or older willing and able to work — in a law initially proposed by Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Wu Chun-cheng (吳春城) to help the nation transition from an aged society to a super-aged society. The law’s passage was celebrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the TPP. The brief show of unity was welcome news, especially after 10 months of political fighting and unconstitutional amendments that are damaging democracy and the constitutional order, eliciting concern
Following a series of suspected sabotage attacks by Chinese vessels on undersea cables in the Baltic Sea last year, which impacted Europe’s communications and energy infrastructure, an international undersea cable off the coast of Yehliu (野柳) near Keelung was on Friday last week cut by a Chinese freighter. Four cores of the international submarine communication cable connecting Taiwan and the US were damaged. The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) dispatched a ship to the site after receiving a report from Chunghwa Telecom and located the Shunxin-39, a Cameroon-flagged cargo ship operated by a Hong Kong-registered company and owned by a Chinese
RSS