The shot fired at Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Committee member Sean Lien (連勝文) at a campaign rally has once again tarnished the image of democracy and elections in Taiwan, casting reason aside and eroding the dignity of Taiwanese. People were just beginning to forgive and forget after the March 19, 2004, shooting of then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his vice president, Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), when the shot fired at Lien on Nov. 26 once more stirred up resentment and enmity. That evening added another black mark to Taiwan’s history, bringing gloom and despondency to all. How long will it be until Taiwan can finally be free of such tragedies?
The shot fired that night brought fear in its wake, as could be seen in the solemn faces all around. At the same time, many people set about pondering on the shooting and trying to figure out what effect it might have had on the votes cast for the contending parties. What a sad day for Taiwan. Is that all a human life is worth? Is there no more to life in this country than political drama? Is nothing else important?
Besides the serious injury caused to Lien as the bullet tore through his face, an innocent bystander was also hit and killed. The bullet pierced Taiwan’s very heart and highlighted its tragic past and present. Confrontation is still with us. When will it ever go away? This gunshot may well have dire and unpredictable consequences that will remain with us for a long time.
What can we learn from this election? Frankly speaking, its negative aspects outweigh the positive. There were many bad examples of politicians stirring up trouble, sharpening the confrontation between supporters of the pan-blue and pan-green camps and creating a hostile division in which neither side could tolerate the other.
Will this be Taiwan’s fate forever? Are we really willing to be dragged down to such depths? I live here and I certainly don’t have the confidence to tell the world about Taiwan and its elections. The gulf between the two sides has become so deep that it seems impossible to bridge. Who is responsible for this tragic outcome? Without doubt, neither governing nor opposition parties can deny their responsibility; still less do they have any grounds for blaming their rivals. The election is over and the votes have been counted, but the bullet fired that evening has burned a deep wound in people’s hearts. How can we now stand before the world and claim that Taiwan is a model of democracy?
One election is over and done with, but the next will follow before very long. Politicians of both camps — government and opposition — must look beyond the goal of holding on to or gaining control of political power. They must without delay take responsibility for the vulgar language and violence that undermine moral values and social order and come up with a remedy that will fully remove these ills. If not, the next insult or violent act may have unimaginable consequences.
People have had enough of such irrational and unjustifiable violence that creates discord in Taiwan and ruins its reputation. The public must boldly tell politicians that we want to see reason, security and harmony in our lives, and we want a competent, capable and conscientious government. More than that, we want an environment of tolerance in which everyone can compete on an even playing field. These demands are quite fundamental, but we must ask those in authority — what have you done to make them a reality? Is it really too much to ask?
When elections draw to a close, inevitably some will be pleased with the result and others disappointed. Although the shot fired that night may make us ashamed and fearful, we cannot just go on wallowing in an atmosphere of tragedy. We should not give up our insistence on reason and moderation, truth and justice.
It is time to say no to vulgar insults and thuggery and to let the Taiwanese virtues of honesty, tolerance and tenacity come to the fore. We demand of all those in authority that they ensure a secure and stable environment for Taiwan and all the people who live and work here. This is what the public ardently desires. Let us ask of those who have been newly elected, as well as those already in office: Can you pledge to do these things and will you hold true to your promises?
Li Hua-chiu is a researcher with the National Policy Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals. For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion. In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC). Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues. During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the
RSS