On the eve of the special municipality elections on Nov. 27, Sean Lien (連勝文), son of former vice president Lien Chan (連戰), took to the stage in Taipei County to stump for Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) city councilor candidate Chen Hung-yuan (陳鴻源). Without warning, a gunshot rang out and Sean Lien fell, seriously injured. The actual motive for the shooting is still being investigated, but what is certain is that the incident has cast a shadow over politics and elections in Taiwan.
Some people have mentioned that this represents a failure of security, while others believe it should be interpreted as a -politically motivated shooting. There is also the theory that Sean Lien was the victim of mistaken identity and the bullet did not have his name on it at all. Whatever the truth is, because a shooting took place where people had gathered on the eve of the election, and given Sean Lien’s high political profile, the incident was immediately reported around the world. The BBC and Hong Kong media outlets gave it quite in-depth coverage. As a result, the incident has taken on both political and security implications.
Since this was a political shooting, it was immediately clear that it could not be treated in the same way as any other criminal case. The investigators had to have a degree of political sensitivity, otherwise the investigation could have attracted external complications and even blown up into a political storm. Following the shooting, it was important for the government to ensure the basic facts of the case were publicly announced in the shortest time possible, to make sure the respective camps did not get the chance to put their own unfounded political interpretation or spin on the course of events.
To this end, the National Police Agency went into overdrive and called a press conference on the night of the shooting to announce the facts as they understood them at the time. That was certainly commendable. It was also the first stage in the police’s standard operational procedure when dealing with crimes of a political nature. The point is, it is of utmost importance to announce the “facts” of a case such as this as soon as possible to reassure the public and, in particular, the politicians.
Why? Because people are given to interpreting any given set of facts differently, depending on an individual’s political views.
This leads us to the prickly issue of scientific evidence, which, should it be lacking, could allow the truth as presented to be compromised or turned on its head. This in turn could well lead to needless controversy.
In the case at hand, this is what we know: Sean Lien was present at the campaign headquarters of a Sinbei City councilor candidate and allegedly during the evening was shot at close range by the suspect Lin Cheng-wei (林正偉), who apparently carried a handgun. The victim was shot in the face and is currently being treated in the emergency room of National Taiwan University Hospital. That’s basically it.
The evidence amassed includes video recordings of the shooting, photographs of the crime scene, the gun and a number of bullets. There was some other evidence, but the police decided to hold it back, concerned that it had been compromised in the chaos and was therefore unreliable. That is something they can address over the course of the subsequent investigation.
Then comes the huge question mark dangling over the motive. At first, the alleged shooter said he had shot the wrong man. This claim needed clarification — to be corroborated or dismissed — at the time, something that the police neglected to do, failing to interrogate witnesses on the scene. People tend to confuse details, especially of events that happened in the heat of the moment, so it would have been important to compare witness accounts. Without evidence, it is not easy to be absolutely sure he really did shoot the wrong man.
Reading about the alleged assailant in the newspapers and finding out about his past brushes with the law and his history of drug use, the idea that he, indeed, shot the wrong man, rang true at first. However, doubts crept in the next day because of the conflicting witness accounts. Of course, in the absence of any concrete evidence, it is difficult to be sure of the true motivation for a crime.
One has to make up for the lack of concrete evidence by looking at the suspect’s telephone records and checking out the people he has had dealings with in the past. Even then, it is by no means certain that the police will be able to establish the fact that he had been after another target.
In other words, the motive for any given crime can sometimes get obfuscated in the dust kicked up by the conflicting clamor that immediately follows. Differing opinions from all corners are not helpful and can lead to political or electoral controversy.
Political shootings have happened in the past and they will likely happen again. The obvious example would be the March 19, 2004, shooting of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), which caused a huge amount of public debate. Sean Lien’s shooting constitutes another major political crime played out in full view and has caused quite a stir itself.
In order to avoid any unnecessary controversy, I suggest the police set up a standard operating procedure for when such announcements need to be made, so that the details pertaining to a case commanding this much attention conform as much as is possible to the scientific evidence and that this evidence is sufficiently incontrovertible to avoid any unnecessary confusion.
Yang Yung-nane is director of National Cheng Kung University’s political science department.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
RSS