Fri, Dec 03, 2010 page8

• A closer look at the election results

  • By Tung Chen-yuan 童振源
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Saturday’s elections saw the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) retain its hold on Taipei City and the new special municipalities of Sinbei City (currently known as Taipei County) and Greater Taichung (the merger of Taichung city and county), while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won the new special municipalities Greater Tainan (the merger of Tainan city and county) and Greater Kaohsiung (the merger of Kaohsiung city and county).

  However, compared with the local government elections in December last year, the KMT’s share of the overall vote decreased by 7.6 percentage points to 44.5 percent, while the DPP won 49.9 percent. This KMT figure was also 12.5 percentage points, or 1.2 million votes, lower than its vote in the 2008 presidential election. In comparison, the DPP’s share of the vote increased by 4.7 percentage points from 45.2 percent in the previous elections, and it was 7 percentage points, or 300,000 votes, higher than what it received in the 2008 presidential election.

  Faced with these results, the natural question is why the KMT had such a hard time in these elections and why the DPP’s support increased so much.

  Cross-strait relations are stable, more countries are granting Taiwan visa-free privileges, the latest economic growth rate hit a 21-year high and the unemployment rate has dropped below 5 percent. All these facts and figures are evidence of the KMT government’s achievements. But why doesn’t the general public show its approval?

  While cross-strait relations are indeed relatively stable, China has not relented in its military threats and diplomatic suppression of Taiwan, making such improvements seem superficial. The further deregulation of cross-strait economic exchanges has benefited conglomerates most, but the public has yet to experience it directly. The Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) between Taiwan and China is merely a framework agreement without substantial content or obvious benefits apart from certain items on the “early harvest” list. President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) hopes that the ECFA will enable Taiwan to sign free-trade agreements (FTA) with other East Asian countries has not yet become reality. Taiwan’s attempts to participate in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC) and international civil aviation organizations have also been hampered by Chinese obstruction.

  Economic growth has hit a new high, but public wages have remained stagnant for almost 15 years. Meanwhile, commodity prices and housing prices have continued to climb, creating a sense of relative deprivation. The deteriorating income distribution is the worst since 2001. Last year, the average income of the top 20 percent households was 6.34 times that of the bottom 20 percent and the Gini coefficient was 0.345. In comparison, the income gap was 5.98 times in 2007, while the Gini coefficient was 0.340. Although the unemployment rate has dropped below 5 percent, the figure had remained above 5 percent for 22 consecutive months. Not to mention that the government is providing a number of short-term jobs just to improve the jobless rate, although this will do little to eliminate public fears of being thrown out of a job. Besides, the jobless rate was only 3.8 percent when Ma came to power in May 2008. All these have caused great disappointment with the Ma administration.

  As for the DPP’s gain, apart from the advantage offered by its superior local governance, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) should be given credit for her pragmatic leadership, as well as to former premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) for reining in the KMT. After serving as chairwoman for two-and-a-half years, Tsai has guided a resurgent DPP from the lowest ebb to a point where the party is seen as more credible than the KMT based on her insistence on a pragmatic and rational approach. She does not focus on the ideological conflict over unification and independence or confrontation between the pan-blue and pan-green camps. Rather, she stresses fair distribution of interests and the building of a domestic consensus, while focusing on central and southern Taiwan, small and medium enterprises and the lower and middle classes that have been ignored by the Ma administration. In comparison, she labels the KMT as a party promoting big-business politics and a pro-China government that frequently overlooks Taiwan’s sovereignty. The DPP gained much support from voters by focusing the election campaigns on these principles.

  Faced with these election results, the KMT government is likely to review its loss of voter support, push for fair distribution of the fruits of a reviving economy and the building of a domestic consensus. Meanwhile, the DPP is likely to continue to back Tsai’s line and adjust policies to attract both moderates and middle-class voters. This would include speeding up internal discussion of the party’s policies, such as reviewing and building a consensus on the 10-year policy platform ahead of the 2012 presidential election. In other words, DPP policy will focus on four areas: central and southern Taiwan, small and medium enterprises, the lower-middle class and the middle class as a whole.

  Tung Chen-yuan is a professor in the Graduate Institute of Development Studies at National Chengchi University.

  TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Palmeiras hopes for club cup win

  • 2

    Magnitude 6.4 earthquake hits Hualien County

  • 3

    Taiwan to see nine extended holidays in 2026

  • 4

    Pegatron ranks last in Greenpeace report

  • 5

    Hegseth outlines Chinese threat