Last month, I went on an extraordinary, epic journey through the Andes mountains of Peru and Ecuador. The aim was to record the stories of the largely hidden people on the frontline of climate change and see how communities and governments are trying to adapt.
I began at 4,850m on the snows of Mount Cayambe in Ecuador where the glaciers are in full retreat and ended in the oilfields of the Amazon. In between, I came across water conflicts, deserts growing, rivers shrinking, extreme temperatures and diseases spreading, individuals who have seen the snows disappear in their lifetimes and are fearful for their future, and governments seriously worried that they will soon be unable to feed or provide water and power for their populations.
Climate change has fallen off the political agenda in rich countries since the shambles of the Copenhagen summit last year and the headlines have been dominated by global recession. However, while politicians fail to act, the phenomenon continues unabated. In the past week, the three major institutes that calculate global warming have said this year will at least tie for the hottest year yet recorded and it is widely expected that global carbon dioxide emissions will hit record levels.
This year, summer temperatures in Russia and central Asia were 7.8°C above average for a whole month, the Pakistan floods affected more than 20 million people and temperature records were set in 17 countries from Finland to Iraq, Myanmar to Colombia. Again, there was a near-record melting of Arctic sea ice and the UN has recorded more than 700 extreme-weather related disasters.
Yet most of the world has never heard the phrase “climate change” and does not understand the science behind man-induced climate change. Hundreds of millions of people are having to adapt without help to the major changes which they can see are taking place and for which they are not responsible.
This week 193 governments are meeting in Cancun, Mexico, to thrash out a new climate deal. There is no prospect of a legally binding agreement for several years. Instead, there is a massive gap between the pledges made so far by the rich and the actions that science says are needed to avoid the worst of climate change. Latin America, home to 500 million people, will lead the world in demanding more ambition and urgency. This is my account of what I saw there.
Mount Cayambe, Ecuador, at 4,698m: We are dead on the equator, but the wind whips snow from the glaciers and icefields on Ecuador’s third--highest mountain. The 5,897m peak is shrouded in cloud, but the ice, which used to stretch many kilometers down the mountain, has retreated 600m up the mountain in 30 years.
“Ecuador has nearly lost one-third of its ice,” said the glaciologist Bolivar Caceres, the head of the government’s glacier and meteorology unit. “The speed has been incredible. It started in the 1980s and is still accelerating. The glaciers have all retreated miles. Cayambe has lost 40 percent of its ice mass, possibly 10 percent in just the last decade.”
His predictions, however, are based on a 1°C rise in temperatures in the next 80 years, which other glaciologists say could be too conservative.
Pampa Corral, near Cusco, Peru, at 4,100m: The farmer Julio Hanneco grows 215 varieties of potatoes in his highland village.
“I live close to two glaciers. They used to give us light in the night and water. I would only have to walk a few meters and I could touch one. Now they have gone. It takes a whole day to get close to one. There have been so many changes in the climate and I don’t understand what is happening. The seasons used to be certain and we would know when to plant crops. I feel disoriented. I fear soon we will have no water. If that happens, it would be the end of the world for us,” Hanneco said.
La Paz, Bolivia, at 4,058m: New peer-reviewed, US--government funded research suggests that Bolivia and Peru face catastrophic food and water shortages if temperatures rise as predicted. Researchers at the Florida Institute of Technology, funded by the US’ National Science Foundation (NSF), found that Lake Titicaca had twice shrunk 85 percent following temperatures only 2°C to 3°C higher than now.
“The implications would be profound for over 2 million people,” NSF’s Paul Filmer said.
In a separate analysis, the cost of climate change to Bolivia, South America’s poorest country, could be over 7 percent of its GDP by 2025 — almost as much as the country’s combined spending on health and education.
The Paramo, Ecuador, at 3,900m: Highland communities here are having to adapt fast to the changes.
“There is much less rain than before and the land has been overused in the past by big cattle ranches. We need to conserve everything. We have banned cattle and restored 100km of old waterways. It has been a huge community effort but we have increased the amount of water available by 10 percent,” said Humberto Cholango, from the village of More on the flanks of Mount Cayambe.
The retreat of the glaciers also affects the electricity supplies of cities such as La Paz and El Alto in Bolivia which depend on hydropower, Bolivar Caceres said. In Ecuador, where only 3 percent of the water supplies come from glaciers, 15 percent of the water is held in the boggy pasturelands called the Paramo. If this dries up, Cholango said, then cities will have less.
Yauri, Espinar Province, Peru, at 3,816m: The city is cut off and deserted apart from police as we arrive, with a general strike called the next day to protest at government water plans.
Water is only available for between 30 minutes and two hours a day and the situation is worsening, said Nestor Cuti, the president of the Espinar strike committee.
Now the Peruvian federal government plans a reservoir to divert water from a river 300km away to big farmers who are growing vegetables for export to the US. It will leave Espinar even more short of water and -everyone has stopped work.
“We don’t trust the rains any more. Year after year there is less rain. Climate change projections indicate that in years to come we will have next to nothing. We are being condemned to a slow death. This is a climate change strike. The water wars have started here,” Cuti said.
The next day the Espinar water strike spreads to communities near Machu Picchu. One man is killed in clashes with the police.
Huayhuasi, Peru, at 3,700m: Llama and alpaca farmers have been badly hit by recurring water shortages.
“The rains used to be from October to April. Now it rains for two to three months if we are lucky. This year we had deep frosts where the temperature dropped to minus 17°C. Many people died in the province,” Elias Pacco said. “Before, one person could keep several hundred animals. Now there is enough pasture for 10 to 30 only. With Oxfam’s help, we are water harvesting, building dams and small reservoirs. We are insulating our houses against the frosts and using drip irrigation. We have set up early warning systems for frosts and shelters for animals. It can save us, but it costs each family US$1,000 and it takes 20 days of work. Adapting to climate change is expensive.”
Panta Leon, near Cusco, Peru, at 3,600m: “In the old days there was snow on all the mountains, but for 10 years now there has been none. We do not know when to plant,” farmer Julio Hermandez said.
“People are leaving to go to the cities because they can no longer grow crops or keep animals. Perhaps this is a punishment. In the past we used to honor Mother Earth more. It was a happier place then. The mountains looked like they have a white scarf around their necks. We are older now; we saw the snow-capped mountains. What will our children see?” Hernandez asked
Cusco, Peru, at 3,395m: The environment ministry climate official Victor Bustinza said climate change is causing conflict.
“We know of around 1,000 small conflicts over water in this province alone. Almost 50 are big and could become serious. There are 40 percent fewer springs in nine years in just one region. In 1985, we had 23,359 hectares of glacier in the province. By 2006, it was 9,631 hectares — a decrease of almost 60 percent. The melting glaciers hide the diminution of the rains,” Bustinza said.
“When the glaciers have melted then it will be dramatic. Already the declining rainfall is producing serious problems for hydroelectricity. In 30 years’ time, we can expect much less water. The impact will be seen in food security. Climate change is directly affecting food security. We don’t want to alarm people, but we want them to be prepared,” Bustinza said.
Quito, Ecuador, at 2,820m: “The sick Pachamama [Mother Earth] is losing her vital liquid — water,” said Marlon Santi, the president of the Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador (Conaie), the 10-million strong group of indigenous peoples. “Our brothers and sisters used to know when to sow and harvest. We have unusual droughts and floods, and frosts and strange illnesses. We have pests, frosts, worms and new plagues.”
Kichwa Anongo community, eastern Ecuador, at 300m: We have dropped down the mountains into the Amazonian oilfields. More than 4 billion barrels of oil have been extracted in 50 years in Ecuador, but 960 million more barrels have now been found below Yasuni National Park, a “mega-diverse,” UN-protected reserve.
There are more kinds of frogs and toads in Yasuni than are native to the US and Canada combined; more insect species on one tree than in all the US; more birds than in all Europe, as well as two uncontacted tribes.
“Oil has brought illness,” community leader Jiovanni Rivapeneira said. “When the oil companies came many people worked for them. Now we have skin diseases, cancers, intestinal diseases, genetic problems. They flare gas, take the rainwater and contaminate the streams. There have been hundreds of spills in this area.”
“We have responded by banning the companies from our territory. None of our people will work for them again. All we ever got was manual labor and illness. None of us will go back. We have learned from the legionnaire ants that we see in the forest. There are millions of them. They share their food and work as a group. They protect their young. That’s how we have now organized our community. I think that is how all the world must respond,” he said.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has