On Oct. 13 the Alliance for Social Housing asked the government to build rental apartments for disadvantaged and vulnerable members of society. Within a month, Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) announced the location of the first units in Taipei city and county. The initial estimate was for 1,661 apartments, with construction set to begin in December next year at the latest.
Ministry of the Interior figures show the housing price-to-income ratio in the capital is 10.87, the highest in the country, followed by Taipei County with 7.89. The consistently high prices in the greater Taipei area have pushed housing far beyond the reach of ordinary people. Economically and socially disadvantaged groups simply do not have the resources to rent housing in the area, much less buy it.
The idea of social housing in itself is a good one, and the land allocated for the first batch good enough, but 1,661 new apartments is nowhere near enough to ameliorate the problem, much less resolve it. The success of the policy depends on how it is implemented.
There has been a housing policy in place to provide mid to low-cost housing for people on corresponding income levels to buy. The trouble is that if you can only afford cheap housing, you get poorly designed units with tiny rooms and cheap materials. Places in more favorable areas are, of course, very much in demand, and are allocated through a lottery system, whereas those in the less desirable areas often go begging. Even when the places are occupied, people struggle to maintain the property on their limited incomes and the area goes downhill — as evidenced by the Yanji Public Housing District to the east of Taipei, which has developed a reputation for being ramshackle and rowdy.
The government should not go down this path again. A better approach would be to build such housing on a BOT (build, operate, transfer) basis with the units grouped in communities, not individual blocks, which tend to waste valuable land resources. Building communities would allow architects to create complexes that are more in keeping with the times, more environmentally friendly and better designed, as well as more energy and economically efficient. The BOT model would require the units to be professionally maintained, making them more attractive to residents and helping dispel suspicions that the government just wants to keep the poor cooped up together. The BOT system would also mean less initial outlay for the government and an eventual benefit of substantial fees for the operator.
However, the government must be very clear about which groups need assistance, where aid is to be directed and what locations would best suit their needs. For example, the architects should take into account access issues for the elderly and physically or mentally handicapped. There will be differences in considerations for the socially or economically disadvantaged; students from other counties and young people looking for work in Taipei; and families or single people. All of these issues need to be worked out in advance, before a BOT tender is listed.
The government must also think about how it is going to allocate social housing. Both the Housing Act (住宅法) and the Public Assistance Act (社會救助法) clearly define eligibility based on social and economic disadvantages and mid to low-income levels, but there is so much more to clear up. How to deal with students and jobseekers from outside Taipei? What conditions need to be met before a prospective tenant could rent a unit and how are these to be verified? Who should get priority? How should the rent be set and how long should the lease be? How are different groups to be allocated in one community? What kind of management is needed once the units are filled?
All of these are major questions to be considered and the failure to fully answer each one could cripple or doom a revamped social housing program.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic