Elections are cominG up this month both in the US and Taiwan. In the US, voters go to the polls today, while voters in Taiwan will have an opportunity to vote for the mayors of five special municipalities on Nov. 27.
In both countries the elections are likely to change the political landscape significantly: In the US, the continuing high unemployment rate and dissatisfaction with US President Barack Obama’s stimulus packages have led to the “Tea Party” revolt and a resurgence of the Republican opposition. The Republicans seem set to regain a majority in the House of Representatives and may even gain a majority in the Senate.
In Taiwan, the political atmosphere is similarly affected by the continuing high joblessness rate, but voter dissatisfaction is also driven by concerns that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration’s opening to China is leaving Taiwan vulnerable to political pressure from Beijing, which seems determined to push Taipei into an economic embrace leading to eventual unification.
The pushback against these policies, as well as a strong emphasis on good governance and local concerns, may lead to a victory for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in three or four of the five races, a significant comeback after its severe losses in the 2008 legislative and presidential elections.
These elections will thus lead to major changes in the balance of power in both countries: In the US, the Obama administration will have to deal with a Congress that is likely to assert its positions much more strongly than the Congress as presently composed. Past experience has actually shown that it is good for Taiwan if Congress is controlled by a party that is different from the party in power in the administration.
In the present situation, if the Republicans win a majority in the House, this means that Representative Illeana Ros-Lehtinen is likely to become chairperson of the Foreign Affairs Committee if she is re-elected in her Florida district. She has been a staunch supporter of Taiwan, urging the US government to move forward with the sale of F-16 fighter jets to Taiwan and criticizing the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) signed between the Ma administration and China as a “Trojan Horse.”
On the Taiwan side, a significant victory by the DPP will mean that the Ma administration will have to slow down its overtures toward China. It will mean that the government will have to be more in tune with public opinion on sensitive issues such as trade and other relations with its giant neighbor. It will also mean that it needs to take a firmer position in countering China’s coercive measures, whether it is the continuing missile buildup by China or brazen moves to force Taiwan to attend the Tokyo International Film Festival under names that imply that Taiwan is subjugate to China.
So, in the short and medium term the upcoming elections look to benefit US-Taiwan relations. However, on both sides a lot more needs to be done to bring all major political forces to work in the direction of the longer-term goal of normalizing relations between Taiwan and the outside world.
The present policies came into being in the 1970s and do not reflect the present-day reality that Taiwan is a free and democratic country that deserves a better deal. Instead of perpetuating the nation’s political isolation, we need to bring it into the fold, so that Taiwan and its people can play their rightful role as a member of the international community.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals. For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion. In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC). Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues. During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the
RSS