US President Barack Obama, the sixth US president to visit India since it gained independence, arrives at a trying time, both for the US and for India. Some of Obama’s closest advisers have just resigned, opening an awkward gap on national security and the economy — the focus of his meetings with India’s government.
For India, the issues on the agenda for Obama’s visit are immense and complex and the options for resolving them are extremely limited. Those related to security in Afghanistan and Pakistan are as treacherous as they have ever been. Bilateral economic, trade and currency disagreements may not be as bitter as they are between the US and China, but they are thorny, and lack of resolution is making them more intractable.
Nuclear non-proliferation remains one of Obama’s priorities, as does the sale of US civilian nuclear technology to India, for which former US president George W. Bush cleared the way. In addition, Obama will be keen to know what help India can provide with Iran, a country with which India has smooth relations, owing to their shared worries over Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Illustration: June Hsu
Given this potent list of challenges, what are the prospects for Obama’s passage to India? Some years ago, I was queried by then US deputy secretary of state Strobe Talbott, who was helping to prepare then-US president Bill Clinton’s visit. As India’s foreign minister at the time, I told him: “Why make the visit destinational? Be content with the directional,” or some such words. That response retains its flavor today: As new directions in India-US relations are set, new destinations will follow.
All state visits are overloaded with lofty, superfluous rhetoric. US-India summits are particularly prone to this hubris: the Great Republic meets the World’s Largest Democracy. It would be better for both countries to shed some of these marigold garlands of cloying adjectives.
Another feature of such summits — the trading of lists of “must do” and “can do” items — should also be retired. It is both demeaning and tedious to treat an arriving US president as a stars-and-stripes Santa Claus, to be presented with lengthy wish lists. Likewise, despite the pinched economic circumstances of the US, Obama would do well not to use his visit to peddle US wares. Although trade is an effective lubricant of good relations, these sorts of talks are for the “sherpas,” not Obama and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, to handle.
These two great countries, “natural allies” in the words of former Indian prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, should reflect on what they have accomplished together since 1998, in order to map what lies ahead. Theirs is now a relationship of equals, so their national interests need to be reconciled on everything from Pakistan to climate change.
Indeed, Obama is placed in a unique position for a US president, a position that he appears to comprehend, though his domestic opponents do not. Power today begins in the acceptance of the limits placed upon it. This is also true of an India that is only now coming to recognize its new status in the world, in which the country’s limits and responsibilities have expanded mightily.
Ours is an unstable neighborhood, one that the US has entered without fully understanding the consequences — for India and for the neighborhood. India must ask Obama hard questions about how security is to be assured, but before doing so, it needs to ask the same questions of itself.
India must make clear — and the US must recognize — that a sub-continental country of a billion-plus people cannot be kept within the categorical confines of “South Asia.” The US must accept and candidly discuss the damaging consequences of its military, diplomatic and political overreach — of a “war too far” that has brought the region to its current ugly impasse.
What can the two countries do, separately and together? Both leaders must accept that history is destiny and that the irrefutable logic of geography is a determinant of it. This is the only relevant and reliable guide in meeting the region’s complex challenges.
The constraints on US options, the veto of circumstances, offers little room for diplomatic improvisation. Here the greatest constraint is the US’ difficult and worsening relationship with Pakistan. India must understand this troubled partnership, into which the US entered with its eyes wide open, though it would help if Washington accepted that India has paid — and continues to pay — a very high price on this account. Only through such acceptance can the two countries chart a common future.
Likewise, it would be unwise for the US to gratuitously offer China a role in the affairs of a region that includes India itself — something that Obama appeared to do during his visit to China earlier this year, when he mentioned China as having a role to play in Kashmir. The US should also stop questioning India’s relationship with Iran, a neighbor with which India is linked by many centuries of economic, cultural and even civilizational ties.
Two great peoples and countries, although now locked in a “strategic alliance,” may occasionally fall out of step with one another, as India and the US have — for example, over global climate negotiations, but, at such moments, Obama might do well to recall Vajpayee’s words during Clinton’s visit, when he quoted Walt Whitman’s poem Passage to India:
“Sail forth — steer for the deep waters only,
Reckless O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me,
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go.”
Jaswant Singh, a former Indian foreign minister, finance minister and defense minister, is an opposition member of parliament.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals. For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion. In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC). Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues. During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army is pressuring Taiwan using high intensity tactics to tire out Taiwanese forces and force them into making mistakes, The Economist cited Navy Commander Admiral Tang Hua (唐華) as saying in an interview published on Thursday last week. China is “using an ‘anaconda strategy’ to squeeze the island,” he said, adding that it is “slowly, but surely” increasing its presence around the nation. “They are ready to blockade Taiwan at any time they want,” Tang said. It is welcome to see a high-level official give an interview to international media on this matter. Although Taiwan is one
RSS