They won’t give him a break — literally so. US President Barack Obama has reached that point of his presidency when he cannot even join his fellow citizens in the all-American tradition of the August vacation without taking a hit. One group of critics attacks his choice of destination: Martha’s Vineyard on Cape Cod is too swanky for them. Another band of hecklers says he should not be on holiday at all. Chat-show host David Letterman wisecracked: “He’ll have plenty of time for vacations when his one term is up.”
This sounds ominous. Obama is becoming so unpopular that the kings of network light entertainment can suggest he will be a one-termer. Some of the panjandrums of punditry say the idea is no joke. In the midterm elections in November, the polls are currently predicting big gains for the Republicans who combine being furious and fired up with being hypocritical and nihilistic. The Republicans seem to have a very good chance of taking control of the US House of Representatives and the possibility of seizing the US Senate too. If the Democrats go down in big numbers, it will be seen as a referendum on the man in the White House.
How did this happen? Obama has many more positive entries in the ledger than negatives after 18 months in the Oval Office. He has delivered landmark change to healthcare. The reform may not be perfect, and it may not yet be very popular, but that is a big legislative legacy all by itself. Healthcare reform utterly defeated Bill Clinton in his first term. Other modern presidents did not even try to address one of the US’ most intractable problems. In the face of ugly and unyielding opposition, Obama brought it home.
That is one item in a long roll call of substantial delivery, including a US$787 billion stimulus for the economy, groundbreaking change to the regulation of Wall Street, an anti-age discrimination law, reform of the corrupted student loans system and a tax cut for 95 percent of Americans. Republicans bitterly fought most of it in Congress and lambast it to the voters. However, even they, albeit quietly and grudgingly, agree that it is a record of legislative accomplishment unmatched since the Great Society programs of former US president Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s.
PETRAEUS
Obama has put General David Petraeus, the US’ most effective general, directly in charge of the conflict in Afghanistan and presided over a rethink after years of failed strategy. (Whether the new one will be any more successful remains to be seen). He has ended major combat operations in Iraq to the schedule he promised. He has done so without peddling Bushesque delusions that Iraq is a mission accomplished. He has nominated two impressive women to the US Supreme Court. His White House has been a dignified place. It has not been mired in the personal scandals that emasculated the Clinton presidency or riven with the infighting that riddled the Bush administration.
Flawless, he is not, but all in all, Obama has largely turned out to be what he promised to be: a creative, pragmatic reformer.
Abroad, he has also scored some successes. He has reset the US’ relationship with Russia, partly in the hope of tightening the pressure on Iran. He was to welcome the Palestinian president and his Israeli counterpart to the White House yesterday to kick off the first face-to-face talks in 20 months. He has repaired the US’ reputation and relationships with Europe. He has reached out to the Muslim world, sought to strengthen alliances in Asia and striven to work with, rather than against, other countries and international institutions. The world no longer lives on edge for fear that a crazy idea might pop into the head of the White House, a welcome change from the Bush years.
For what deserves to be regarded as an impressive start to a presidency, his reward has been a steep decline in his approval ratings and the threat of a drubbing for his party in the midterms. Part of the explanation is to do with him. He arrived in office on a high tide that was always going to ebb. He was not only the first black president, he was also supposed to be the liberator and transformer of his country. Obama, the candidate-messiah, set a benchmark that Obama, the actual chief executive, was never going to match however much he achieved. Some falling off was inevitable, and that was just with those who actually voted for him. It is worth remembering that most Americans did not have anything invested in Obama in the first place because they did not elect him. They stayed at home on polling day in 2008 or backed his opponent.
NO CELEBRATION
Another part of the explanation is about the Democrats. They could be reveling in their achievements, but they are not. US Senator Christopher Dodd, a veteran Democrat, says: “Democrats don’t know how to celebrate.”
The left of the party has been churlish about Obama’s record, bemoaning the necessary compromises of power as betrayal.
Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, complained that leftish critics of the president “ought to be drug-tested.”
It was impolitic to say that in public, but he was correct. The rest of the party has been cowed by the aggressiveness of their rightwing opponents. Democrats have become defensive about the size of the deficit and the controversies over health reform, with the result that many are not talking about either the stimulus or their most important legislative achievement in many years.
Weeks before the election, Democrat strategists are agonizing in public about what went wrong and generating a cacophony of contradictory advice for Obama. Be more populist, cry some. Be more serious, aver others. Do more to woo the swing voters, say some; talk more to your base, say others. Be more bipartisan, advise some; beat on the Republicans, say others. They are conducting the postmortem before they have seen the body.
The most important component of the explanation is the Americans. They are not a happy people. The main cause of their discontent is a limping economy. For all the billions of dollars poured into stimulus, the unemployment rate is about 9.5 pecent, nearly two points higher than when Obama took office. That official statistic masks a real level of joblessness that is greater still.
The Democrats can and do say that the Great Recession was inherited from the Republicans. Former US president George W. Bush is still an unpopular figure, but he is of diminishing use to the Democrats as an alibi. A recent poll has about three-quarters of voters saying Obama should take responsibility for the state of the economy. It is the economy above all else that has put Americans in a mood which is one part sullen, one part insecure and one part angry. The obvious place to dump all that bad feeling is in the trash can marked government.
GOVERNMENT FUN
Americans do not actually hate government quite as much as they think they do. In the summer, they flock to the superb national parks, which are run by the government. Those Americans who go on vacation to Washington, the capital they are all supposed to despise, will reverentially queue to tour Congress and the White House and pay their respects to the Jefferson, FDR and Lincoln Memorials. They have spent this summer cursing the traffic jams, which are the result of the Obama administration’s spending on repairs and improvements to infrastructure, but they will love it when they have better roads and bridges to drive along in the SUVs manufactured by GM and Chrysler, the motor giants saved by government.
However, in straitened times, government is the default target for Americans’ discontent. It is from this that the rightwing and racist-tinged Tea Party insurgency, which is feeding off the anti-incumbency mood, has prospered.
Midterm, the prognosis does not look at all good for Obama and his party. In the longer term, the outlook is more encouraging. The Tea Partyists are destroying moderate Republicans or forcing Republicans previously considered to be centrists — US Senator John McCain is the best known example — to move to the right in order to save their skins. The Republicans will ultimately suffer from being dragged further away from the center.
The economy will not stay this way forever. All bets are off in the event of a double-dip, but if a reasonable level of prosperity has returned by the time of the next presidential election, Americans will be feeling better about themselves. That will put them in more of a mood to appreciate a generally impressive president whom the world regards as a credit to their country. Three of the last four presidents were re-elected having been in dire positions — much worse than the slump affecting Obama now — during their first term.
My money is still on Obama winning a second term and probably handsomely. And if he does not? He has already accomplished more in half a term than many presidents manage to achieve in two.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
RSS