The Executive Yuan announced last week that it aimed to lure NT$430 billion (US$13.4 billion) of investment to help develop the nation’s 10 flagship projects, which include biotechnology, cloud computing and green energy. Although the government did not say how long it would take to achieve this goal, it did offer an ambitious plan to boost domestic investment to sustain the nation’s economic growth.
The government’s announcement and its plans to hold several investment road shows at home and abroad comes on the heels of the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) with China in late June, which the government believes will help develop Taiwan as an investment springboard to the Chinese market.
However, the government’s latest drive to attract foreign capital also follows complaints about the growing inequality of wealth distribution, a series of industrial safety scares, pollution incidents at industrial parks and uncertainty surrounding the sale of American International Group’s local insurance unit.
At a road show held on Monday, Council for Economic Planning and Development Minister Christina Liu (劉憶如) said the nation should not rely solely on exports to maintain economic growth. Instead, external demand and domestic investment should serve as the economy’s twin engines, she said. On Thursday, Liu reiterated that the government must boost private investment to increase job opportunities and solve the wealth gap problem.
Yet despite the urgent need for more investment in Taiwan to help generate jobs and improve stagnant salaries, policymakers need to realize that potential investors will not hurry to pour in their money unless the government can insulate them from policy inconsistency and bureaucratic red tape.
That is why even though Taiwan has been rated as a favorable investment environment by Business Environment Risk Intelligence (BERI), a US-based research institute during its surveys in recent years, Taiwan has actually received much less foreign direct investment than it should have.
Taiwan was grouped in the category of “below potential” economies in the UN Conference on Trade and Development’s World Investment Report, which defined Taiwan’s economy as having a high potential for foreign investment, but demonstrating a rather low level of actual investment.
In this year’s World Investment Report, Taiwan maintained a No. 22 ranking in the Inward Foreign Direct Investment Potential Index among the world’s 141 economies in both 2007 and 2008 (the most recent years for which the data was available). However, in the Inward Foreign Direct Investment Performance Index, Taiwan ranked 122nd worldwide last year, down from 116th in 2008 and 114th in 2007.
In BERI’s April survey of the world’s 50 major economies, Taiwan was ranked the second-best investment destination in Asia and the fourth-best in the world. However, the government’s latest statistics show a different reality.
In the first seven months of this year, Taiwan only attracted US$2.47 billion in foreign investment, which was down 18.93 percent from a year earlier. In fact, the data collected by the Investment Commission showed that foreign investment in Taiwan has been tumbling in recent years, with the amount falling to US$4.8 billion last year from US$8.2 billion in 2008, US$15.4 billion in 2007 and US$13.9 billion in 2006.
Investment is always welcome as long as it benefits local industries and creates jobs. Liu was absolutely correct that more domestic investment could help deal with the nation’s unemployment and wealth gap problems. However, the government’s plan to attract NT$430 billion of investment will be just more wishful thinking from policymakers unless the government can see through real reforms to deal with the long-standing “below potential” problem of Taiwan’s inward foreign investment.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
Former Japanese minister of defense Shigeru Ishiba has been elected as president of the governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and would be approved as prime minister in parliament today. Ishiba is a familiar face for Taiwanese, as he has visited the nation several times. His popularity among Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers has grown as a result of his multiple meetings and encounters with legislators and prominent figures in the government. The DPP and the LDP have close ties and have long maintained warm relations. Ishiba in August 2020 praised Taiwan’s
On Thursday last week, the International Crisis Group (ICG) issued a well-researched report titled “The Widening Schism across the Taiwan Strait,” which focused on rising tensions between Taiwan and China, making a number of recommendations on how to avoid conflict. While it is of course laudable that a respected international organization such as the ICG is willing to think through possible avenues toward a peaceful resolution, the report contains a couple of fundamental flaws in the way it approaches the issue. First, it attempts to present a “balanced approach” by pushing back equally against Taiwan’s perceived transgressions as against Beijing’s military threats