Revolutions, it is often claimed, do not happen when people are desperate. They occur in times of rising expectations. Perhaps that is why they so often end in disappointment. Expectations, usually set too high to begin with, fail to be met, resulting in anger, disillusion and often in acts of terrifying violence.
Japan’s change of government last year — when the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) broke the almost uninterrupted monopoly on power held by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) since 1955 — was not a revolution. However, rather like the election of the first black president in the US, it did fizz with popular expectations, promising a fundamental shift from the past.
This was even truer of Japan than the US. The DPJ not only put many new faces into power, it was going to change the nature of Japanese politics. At last, Japan would become a fully functioning democracy and not a de facto one-party state run by bureaucrats.
To judge from the Japanese press, as well as the DPJ’s plunging poll ratings, disillusion has already set in. The permanent bureaucracy proved resistant and DPJ politicians, unaccustomed to power, made mistakes. One of the worst was Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan’s announcement in June of a consumption-tax hike just before the Upper House elections, which the DPJ went on to lose badly.
The other disappointment has been the government’s failure to get the US to move its Marine airbase out of Okinawa. This promise by the DPJ was meant to be part of Japan’s new assertiveness, a first step away from being a mere “aircraft carrier” for the US, as a former LDP prime minister once described his country.
If Japan’s status quo is to change, the country’s oddly skewed relationship with the US is a key factor. Too much dependence on US power has warped the development of Japanese democracy in ways that are not always sufficiently recognized by the US.
warped
Japan’s one-party state, under the conservative LDP, was a product of World War II and the Cold War. Like Italy, its old Axis partner during the war, Japan became a front-line state in the battle against communist powers. As in Italy, a right-wing party, backed by the US dominated politics for decades, denying the left any chance to take power. Even former Japanese war criminals, one of whom became prime minister in the late 1950s, turned into subservient allies of the US in the wars (hot and cold) against communism.
In fact, Japanese dependence on the US was even greater than that of Italy and other European powers. West European armies were embedded in NATO. Japan, whose armed forces were entirely blamed for driving the country into the catastrophic Pacific War, was not even supposed to have an army or navy after the war. During their occupation of Japan in the 1940s, the US wrote a new pacifist Constitution, which made the use of Japanese military force abroad unconstitutional. In matters of war and peace, Japan abdicated sovereignty.
Most Japanese were happy to be pacifists and concentrate on making money. Japanese governments could devote their energy to building up the country’s industrial wealth, while the US took care of security, and by extension much of Japan’s foreign policy. It was an arrangement that suited everyone: The Japanese became rich, the US had a compliant anti-communist vassal state and other Asians, even communist China, preferred Pax Americana to a revival of Japanese military clout.
However, this strategy came with a steep political price. A democracy that is over-dependent on an outside power and monopolized by one party, whose main role is to broker deals between big business and the bureaucracy, inevitably becomes stunted and corrupt.
political price
Italy, under the Christian Democrats, had the same problem. However, the end of the Cold War in Europe changed the political status quo — with mixed results, to be sure. Old parties lost power, which was a good thing. The vacuum was filled in Italy by the rise of Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, which may have been less of a good thing. In East Asia, by contrast, the Cold War is not yet entirely over. North Korea still causes trouble, and China is nominally a communist state.
However, it is a very different world from the one left in ruins in 1945. For one thing, China has become a great power and Japan, like other Asian countries, must adapt to new circumstances. Although it is the only Asian democracy able to balance the power of China, the system established after World War II is not well suited to this task.
This was recognized by the DPJ, which would like Japan to play a more independent role, as a more equal ally, rather than a mere protectorate of the US, and thus be a more assertive political player in Asia. Hence, the first symbolic step was to get the US to move its marines from Okinawa, an island that has carried the burden of a US military presence for much too long.
The US did not see things that way. The DPJ threatened to change comfortable old arrangements, whereby the US could more or less tell the Japanese what to do. As a result, the US showed little patience with Japan on the question of Okinawa, and has barely concealed its contempt for the DPJ government, feeding popular disappointment with its performance so far.
The US seems to prefer an obedient one-party state to a difficult, faltering, but more democratic partner in Asia. US President Barack Obama’s administration, struggling to fulfill its own promises of change, should be more understanding of its Japanese counterpart. If the US is as serious about promoting freedom abroad as it claims, it should not be hindering the efforts of one of its closest allies to strengthen its democracy.
Ian Buruma is professor of democracy and human rights at Bard College, New York.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
RSS