Although President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relied on artful propaganda and image building to win the presidency in 2008, he has failed to deliver on a slew of promises over the last two years. However, the government has recently had more to worry about than its failure to live up to Ma’s promises, with a series of embarrassing incidents symptomatic of an administration that has time and again shown its management abilities to be severely lacking: police collusion with organized crime, drunken parties in the control tower at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport and alleged bribe taking by High Court judges, to mention just a few.
The way these scandals just keep on coming highlights the fundamental rot inside the government and the risk that professional standards could be allowed to wither and die under the Ma administration. All have been dealt with in the same formulaic way — set up an investigation team and transfer the offenders elsewhere. Unfortunately, this approach fails to recognize the underlying problem that ties all these incidents together — a decline in professionalism.
Allegations of sexual harassment of employees by top management at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport, allowing the control tower to be turned into a bar and the recent collapse of a passenger gangway have shone a much-needed light on the chaotic goings on at the nation’s No. 1 international airport. Unfortunately, the problem does not stop at the irresponsible behavior of control tower staff, but extends to the government’s inability to handle the issue properly.
The minister and deputy minister of transportation and communications and the head of the Civil Aeronautics Administration initially said investigations had shown the allegations to be inaccurate. When they were later revealed to be true, the government had egg on its face. In the end, the premier had to order that the guilty parties be replaced. This does not inspire much confidence in any future reforms announced by the Ministry of Transportation and Communications.
The recent shooting of an alleged gangster in Taichung unexpectedly highlighted close ties between police and organized crime. As a direct result, new rules were drawn up, but whether in Taiwan or abroad, it goes without saying that such rules already exist. In other words, the “changes” were a public relations maneuver aimed at deflecting further scrutiny.
The alleged bribe taking by Taiwan High Court judges who changed a 15-year prison sentence for former KMT legislator Ho Chih-hui (何智輝) to not guilty on appeal is another example. We rely on appeals court judges to be defenders of justice, which, if the allegations against them are proven to be true, would make their behavior particularly disappointing. It also takes judicial reform right back to square one, where it has apparently languished all these years. Many judges are still unable to say no to money, women and political temptation and the judicial system offers few ways to monitor or correct their behavior.
A comparison between KMT and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) governments shows few differences when it comes to public policy, but the less experienced DPP was bolder, more decisive and more administratively efficient. The KMT has 50 years of government experience, but it places too much emphasis on relationships and satisfying everyone, which can easily lead to sub-standard candidates and dereliction of duty.
All these examples indicate that the government is starting to unravel. If it fails to make an honest effort to do better and correct the many errors of its ways then the KMT is doing Taiwan a great disservice and will pay an electoral price in the year-end special municipality elections.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS