While the scandal surrounding the recent suicides at Foxconn’s “sweatshops” in China seems to have been put to rest by the company’s pay increases, these 12 suicides are just the tip of the iceberg.
The real problems run much deeper, and are warning signs that Taiwanese businesspeople with operations in China and the Taiwanese cannot afford to ignore.
This reveals several things to Taiwanese businesspeople.
China is a large country where anything can happen and few can predict what kinds of things could happen there.
One example of this is the Huang Chao peasant uprising that contributed to the fall of the Tang dynasty. A more recent example was the emergence of the Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution. The ramifications of these events were far greater than the 12 suicides we have seen recently at the Foxconn plant.
The next thing we should learn from these recent events is that the implications of the word “sweatshop” by certain Chinese media outlets run deeper than one might think. The word “sweatshop” will now follow Taiwanese businesspeople everywhere they do business in China and is a curse that could wreak havoc on their business activities at any time. On this point, this curse is most likely to reveal itself on the operations of Taiwanese businesspeople once unification through economic means has finally been achieved.
The fact that pay at the Foxconn plant was raised by about 20 percent shows that Foxconn had indeed been running a “sweatshop” and abusing the rights of its workers, just as the Chinese media had accused.
This is not something that will be forgotten just because the company raises salaries: It could be used against Taiwanese businesspeople when they are looking to set up factories in China in the future.
When this happens, under orders from China’s new generation of Red Guards, investment guarantees will be worth nothing and no Taiwanese will dare ruffle feathers in China. Running back to Taiwan will also be of no avail since Taiwan will have already “returned to the embrace of the motherland.”
Taiwan as a nation should learn three things from this.
We can now see how shortsighted the plans made by Taiwan’s economic experts and government officials were. They were originally supposed to move production to China while keeping operation, research and development in Taiwan.
However, the plans merely resulted in Taiwanese businesspeople becoming enslaved in China and saw them go down the path of setting up “sweatshops.” There is no going back from there.
Perhaps the aforementioned shortsighted economic plans were the result of China’s use of economic means to promote unification and Taiwanese businesspeople using their businesses in China to influence political decisions and policy here in Taiwan.
However, our government’s economic experts should have been aware that businesspeople are only interested in profits. Surely the government should be held accountable for its misguided policies based on listening to Taiwanese businesspeople and their calls to have cross-strait resources integrated.
The suicides at Foxconn prove that putting down roots and conducting business from one’s own country is the only lasting way to go about doing business, as the Korean companies Samsung and LG have done.
This is also the only way that industries can be upgraded. In the past, Taiwanese investment accounted for half of China’s direct foreign investment. Korean exports, however, overtook Taiwan’s exports to China a long time ago.
It is clear that Korea has bettered Taiwan by maximizing its quality and technology and this proves that the sweatshops Taiwanese businesses have set up by integrating resources from Taiwan and China were just a shortsighted way to make a quick buck.
Perhaps in the short-term this may prove beneficial to Taiwanese businesspeople, but for Taiwan as a whole it is very damaging. The government’s policy of opening up to China, an economic cooperation framework agreement and a “One China Market” are just going to hasten self-destruction.
With disaster approaching, I hope that things can be turned around before it is all too late.
Huang Tien-Lin is a former national policy adviser.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals. For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion. In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC). Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues. During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the
RSS