Taiwan’s environment is a sensitive topic, as seen by the controversy over the transformation of the 202 Munitions Works in Taipei City’s Nangang District (南港) into a biotech park. When this biotech park for Academia Sinica was being planned, I was responsible for seeking government approval to build a new synchrotron radiation facility called the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS), in Hsinchu. I therefore know a bit about what the government was thinking concerning the development of Taiwan’s science parks.
The recent completion of Taiwan’s high speed rail has greatly shortened the time needed for business to be conducted along the west coast. Even more importantly, now that Hsinchu Science Park, Central Taiwan Science Park and Southern Taiwan Science Park have all been linked for daily round-trip operations, the government hopes that the high speed rail can be used to enhance the creativity and vitality of Taiwan’s biotech industry.
When the site of the new TPS facility was being negotiated with the Council for Economic Planning and Development and the Environmental Protection Administration, planning was already underway for the high speed rail line to be extended to the 202 Munitions Works site. At that time, Academia Sinica had also just finished building the National Clinical Core for Genomic Medicine. If these facilities were coupled with the proposed biotech park, the Nankang area would become an innovative think tank for Taiwan’s pharmaceutical industry.
The government also hoped that the cutting-edge biotech facilities developed at TPS could become the heart of research and development operations. The research findings made in the north could then be transmitted to Kaohsiung Biotechnology Park with the aid of the high speed rail network.
The proposal for the construction of TPS experienced many setbacks, but we eventually managed to settle its location in Hsinchu, next to National Tsing Hua University and National Chiao Tung University. It should be stressed that without these two leading research universities, the synchrotron would not be able to perform the central, leading role it was designed to do. Similarly, if Academia Sinica’s National Clinical Core for Genomic Medicine does not have a biotech park nearby, it will not be able to perform as an innovative think tank-like organization. Luckily, construction has already started on the TPS, with a construction budget of NT$7 billion (US$218 million). Let us hope that the issue of the 202 Munitions Works can also be settled as soon as possible.
Academia Sinica at Nangang has gathered together a group of 200 to 300 holders of doctorates in biotechnology, after years of effort. In the past two years, Academia Sinica president Wong Chi-Huey (翁啟惠), has talked about the future of a biotech park at Academia Sinica. He envisions using the new park as an opportunity to invite a new generation of Taiwanese students studying abroad back to Taiwan, as the addition of these biotech experts would inject new vitality into Taiwan’s biotech industry. The history of science and technology has shown us that in many innovation parks in advanced nations, research staff often make the greatest discoveries when they least expect to, with innovative ideas springing forward in an environment where research staff can chat freely.
For this to happen, a culture of interaction is vital. The National Clinical Core for Genomic Medicine at Academia Sinica already has some of the world’s finest laboratories, as well as many world-class research centers. It would be best if the future biotech park could be built at the site of the 202 Munitions Works, as it is situated next door to Academia Sinica. In this regard, we should remember those Taiwanese students who studied overseas and returned to Taiwan in the 1970s and 1980s. These returnees mostly settled in the Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park. An industry cluster was created there, and it was this cluster effect that gave birth to Taiwan’s extremely successful semiconductor industry.
Lately, Wong has said that South Korea’s patent rights for pharmaceutical manufacturing are already way ahead of Taiwan’s. Over the past decade, I have often traveled between South Korea, Japan and Taiwan and have noticed that we are falling behind these countries, as we lack the strategic foresight and vigor to forge a new path forward.
The differences between Japan, South Korea and Taiwan can be seen in the innovation and research park that is being developed on a mountain range in the suburbs of Sejong City, South Korea, to commemorate the rulers of the Yi dynasty who laid the foundations for scientific research in that country 600 years ago. Here in Taiwan, however, people are still arguing over where to build our new biotech park.
The construction of modern science and technology parks can absolutely coexist with the natural environment, the Harima Science Garden City of Japan’s Hyogo Prefecture being a prime example. Given the high level of environmental awareness Taipei residents have, we should have the utmost confidence that the 9.6 hectare piece of land the 202 Munitions Works stands on can be developed in harmony with its natural surroundings. In addition, biotechnology is a form of green technology characterized by low levels of pollution that can benefit the health of humankind and contribute to the biodiversity of our planet.
As countries around the world are investing large amounts of money getting biotech experts to help them with the development of their industries, we are running out of time to lay the foundations for the next 50 years of Taiwan’s economic development.
Keng Liang is the former director of the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
With the Year of the Snake reaching its conclusion on Monday next week, now is an opportune moment to reflect on the past year — a year marked by institutional strain and national resilience. For Taiwan, the Year of the Snake was a composite of political friction, economic momentum, social unease and strategic consolidation. In the political sphere, it was defined less by legislative productivity and more by partisan confrontation. The mass recall movement sought to remove 31 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators following the passage of controversial bills that expanded legislative powers and imposed sweeping budget cuts. While the effort
When Hong Kong’s High Court sentenced newspaper owner Jimmy Lai (黎智英) to 20 years in prison this week, officials declared that his “heinous crimes” had long poisoned society and that his punishment represented justice restored. In their telling, Lai is the mastermind of Hong Kong’s unrest — the architect of a vast conspiracy that manipulated an otherwise contented population into defiance. They imply that removing him would lead to the return of stability. It is a politically convenient narrative — and a profoundly false one. Lai did not radicalize Hong Kong. He belonged to the same generation that fled from the Chinese
There is a story in India about a boy called Prahlad who was an ardent worshipper of Lord Narayana, whom his father considered an enemy. His son’s devotion vexed the father to the extent that he asked his sister, Holika, who could not be burned by fire, to sit with the boy in her lap and burn him to death. Prahlad knew about this evil plan, but sat in his aunt’s lap anyway. His faith won, as he remained unscathed by the fire, while his aunt was devoured by the flames. In some small way, Prahlad reminds me of Taiwan
Former Hong Kong media magnate Jimmy Lai (黎智英), who on Monday was sentenced to 20 years in jail for his role in the 2019 Hong Kong democracy movement and “colluding with foreign forces,” once called on members of the US government for support in his struggle against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Speaking to a forum at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in July 2019, Lai, speaking about the US having the moral authority over the CCP, said: “It’s like they are going to battle without any weapon, and you have the nuclear weapon. You can finish them in
RSS