Hon Hai Group (鴻海集團) has announced two salary raises in a week for its Foxconn plant in Shenzhen, resulting in a total raise of 122 percent. The event has shaken the Taiwanese stock market, shocked Taiwanese businesspeople along the southern China coast and changed the environment for China’s export-oriented processing industry. Many Taiwanese investors and other foreign businesspeople now worry that the era when China was a low-cost paradise has come to an end with Hon Hai’s massive salary increases.
Contract manufacturers rely on low labor costs to make relatively small profits. However, when a society has developed to a certain level, labor costs increase. This means that businesses cannot continue to rely on low costs alone to make a profit. The fact is that industries in coastal areas of China have experienced a series of collective demands for salary increases. Workers at Honda’s Chinese plants are striking for higher salaries and those at a Taiwanese-invested mechanical plant in Kunshan in Jiangsu Province went on strike last Saturday, demanding pay raises and an improved work environment. The number of workers on strike soon reached 1,000 and they have refused to leave despite efforts by the police to disperse them. Not until the company’s chairman promised to raise salaries and improve the quality of food and the work environment did the strike end.
Some people are guessing that Hon Hai’s highly unusual double pay raise may be the result of Chinese government pressure and others think China wants to get rid of Hon Hai and let a local Chinese company take over as the king of contract manufacturers. However, there is currently nothing to back up either viewpoint.
Hon Hai is the first company to react to the calls of Chinese workers for higher pay. In this context the raises are both a passive, defensive measure and an aggressive strategic attempt to deal with a new situation.
On the one hand, the raise counteracts the negative impact of the 12 suicides at Foxconn’s Shenzhen plant, as it may improve morale among workers and alleviate concerns that Foxconn is a sweatshop. Labor stability will probably be higher than before the problems began and production will also become more predictable, which will result in higher productivity.
On the other hand, Hon Hai sold its worker dormitories to the local government and then raised salaries to subsidize workers renting their accommodation from the government. This also means that the company has passed the hot issue of the workers’ leisure time on to the government and it no longer has to take responsibility for its workers’ lives. The initiative to raise salaries will increase public income and raise workers’ buying power, and that will help the company enter the 3C — computer, communication and consumer electronics — market. When a market leader such as Hon Hai offers such massive salary increases, it puts great pressure on other electronics companies and might even force competitors out of the market. In addition, the increased expenditure can be passed on to US, EU and Japanese companies so that it does not affect Hon Hai’s profits. The move could even turn out to be a crucial first step toward the transformation of China’s labor-intensive industries.
Another side effect of the big raise could be that some Taiwanese companies see more clearly the uncertainties of the Chinese market and decide to return to Taiwan to invest in automated plants. If that is the case, then Taiwan should thank Terry Gou (郭台銘) for such an unexpected gift.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
RSS